New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    26
    #1
    guys help please... obviously mas ma porma ang city, pero overall, sa mga owners and had a chance to drive both, what are your opinions? di syo magkalevel pero price wise malapit... what do you think guys?...

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    29,354
    #2
    which cars are you referring to?

    2010 Lancer GLS 1.6L

    or

    2010 Lancer EX GLS 2.0L

  3. Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,139
    #3
    i think his referring to the old body lancer. IMHO mas sulit yon kesa city.

    Unless you prefer porma over value for money.

  4. Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,057
    #4
    I'll go for the lancer. Wider body, good handling, good casa and good after sales service.

  5. Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,677
    #5
    *ghosthunter - old body po yung tinutukoy niya since "upgraded" ang term niya.

    *TS - i'd go for the Lancer GLS upgraded, this car is so called "bang for the buck" car since lahat almost ng features nandito sa sasakyan bukod sa porma, performance, wider body etc. downside, mas luma ang technology na gamit but for me, it is not really a downside.

  6. Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    26
    #6
    yup old body po tinutukoy ko...

    thanks mga sir, kasi i know ang 1.3s a/t ng city mahihirapan sa mga mataas na road compared sa lancer gls... pero maporma siyang nahihirapan umakyat hehehe.. hay... need more inputs sir...


    thanks sobra sa mga opinions mga kapatid...

  7. Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    26
    #7
    more inputs please... still deciding on this.. thanks!
    regarding FC, ride, performance, looks...

  8. Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    146
    #8
    definitely mas matipid sa gas City 1.3 for 1 driver and 1 passenger. Pero if you re going to compute its periodic maintenance including parts replacement, mas mahal pa kaysa sa mitsu.

    Pag honda magaling sa fuel efficient technology pero ang mahal naman magpa-service sa kanila. mahal p ng parts.

  9. Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    21,667
    #9
    I'd go for the Lancer.

    Pangit lang sa lancer is yung trunk niya, hirap isara and yung interior niya ... di ganun kaappealing unlike sa Honda City.

    Pero overall, if you prefer performance over porma ... lancer talaga. Equipped na siya with safety features, rear disc brakes etc.

    The rattling noise, IDK if it's still evident. You should ask around in the Lancer gls/glx thread.

  10. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    29,354
    #10
    Quote Originally Posted by bikeng View Post
    more inputs please... still deciding on this.. thanks!
    regarding FC, ride, performance, looks...
    For stuff like ride quality, performance and looks, it can be very subjective to each person's individual preferences.

    It would be best to give the cars a test drive so you would have first hand experience on how these cars would rate in those categories.

    But if FC is your primary concern, with your budget limits, you might opt for the Honda City 1.3S M/T ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Lancer gls upragded or city 1.3 a/t