L300 dropside vs. Suzuki Apv Carry Dropside

[stv13]

What's your take on this guys in terms of the ff:

* fuel consumption
* durability
* resale value
* maintenance
* more value for money
* parts availability
* casa warranty




Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

[cpsolt]

apv carry dropside is gasoline powered - meaning less threat from "asbu"wayas.

[marktams86]

+1 on this one.

Sent from my GT-B5330 using Tapatalk

[stv13]

Any forumer here who has knowledge about suzuki apv fuel consumption and maintenance? Pls help.TIA.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

[jp923]

Fc of apv van without to light load 8-9.5km/L city driving.

Sent from my SC-01E using Tapatalk

[stv13]

8-9.5km/L consumption...not bad for a 1.6ltr engine van.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

[vinj]

Fc of apv van without to light load 8-9.5km/L city driving.

Sent from my SC-01E using Tapatalk

That should tally up... the a/t version we had at the office was doing 5km/L++ to 6 and that was with a heavy foot. The m/t should do at least 8.

Overall, the Mitsu is easier to maintain because of sheer availability of parts and mechanical knowledge but the APV will encounter less headaches with the ASBU and LGUs as long as you keep it clean and non-noticeable (keep it looking like a private vehicle). Best to keep the APV properly maintained though (regular PMS, cleaning of sensors, etc.) and don't expect it to wade floods like a L300 FB driver may do; It will still serve you well.

[rac98]

What's your take on this guys in terms of the ff:

* fuel consumption
* durability
* resale value
* maintenance
* more value for money
* parts availability
* casa warranty




Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Based on your given terms, ill take the l300. Try adding 2t to lessen smoke. Will it be carrying heavy stuff? Because I think the apv would not achieve good fuel consumption if it will carry heavy stuff most of the time.

[dct]

Based on your given terms, ill take the l300. Try adding 2t to lessen smoke. Will it be carrying heavy stuff? Because I think the apv would not achieve good fuel consumption if it will carry heavy stuff most of the time.

i agree. plus the fact that L300 is much spacious and can seat 3 people

or h100. mas hindi mausok

[stv13]

Based on your given terms, ill take the l300. Try adding 2t to lessen smoke. Will it be carrying heavy stuff? Because I think the apv would not achieve good fuel consumption if it will carry heavy stuff most of the time.

Will be used for water station deliveries.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk