Honda Civic 2006 [1.8] or Honda Civic 2006 [2.0]

[niky]

Yup... above average by US standards, but should be a rocket here.

[squala]

I'm quite skeptic on the 2.0 because it's more-or-less a carried over K20 from the previous generation, perhaps reworked and refined a bit. The 1.8, on the other hand, is an all-new engine. I'm also more confident that its better economy is more noticeable than its slightly lower power and torque. Too bad though the A/T version of the 1.8 isn't paddle shift, but heck, it's a Honda so get M/T!

And Niky, are you sure the 1.8 A/T is CVT? If I read the brochure right, it's a 5-speed automatic. The same also applies to the 2.0 A/T.

[niky]

I didn't say it was CVT. Wish it was, though.

[petjdm]

i go 4 2.0, bcoz i drive the 2.0. hehe... pero tipid cya,, yah yung nag mentioned na yung civic 2.0s is from the EP civic si and 2003 rsx.. it means.. its still knock your socks off.. hehehe

[rj_tim]

i go 4 2.0, bcoz i drive the 2.0. hehe... pero tipid cya,, yah yung nag mentioned na yung civic 2.0s is from the EP civic si and 2003 rsx.. it means.. its still knock your socks off.. hehehe

Dude, ano ang computed mileage mo with your 2.0? City and highway?

[rj_tim]

O.T.

Saan/ano ang magandang dealerships ng Honda?

[Bry]

Go for the 2.0 bro.

[niky]

Because it costs about one Picanto more. :lol:

Truthfully, the 2.0 Civic is likely faster than the Mazda6 2.3, but the 2.3 is much nicer to drive. In fact (quick confession), while I felt the Focus to be a bit stodgy when compared to the RS, and the Civic a bit too soft, I found the Mazda6 delightfully playful and light on its feet. But then, that's just me.