The argument started when you claimed that a FWD car would sustain more damage in a frontal collision, here:
Note: Laser? Telstar? They didn't last long because after they came out, Ford pulled out of the Philippines and they all rusted to death. That said, there are still cars like that on the road.
Nothing to do with FWD or RWD. We owned a Laser. Never had any problems with it, mechanically, as opposed to the RWD Chevy we had before it... it's just that the chassis and exhaust rusted to pieces in the time that we owned.
RWD versus FWD? Cefiro GTS-R versus Galant GTi... which do you see more of on the road?
Then you amended it to this:
Then we noted that said collision would have to be extremely severe, so:
I've destroyed several mags due to potholes on the Lynx. Cracked a few. Had to replace lots of suspension parts... bushings... tie rod ends. Never had to replace a CV Joint. Some cars have weak CV Joints. Some don't. Whoopee. Given that both Vios and Avanza have front McPhersons built by the same company... which would be more prone to damage, again, if we take the CV Joint out of the equation? (And I've posted already about the cost of CV Joint replacement versus running costs and distance travelled)
Then you started posting links to nonsense discussions about FWD versus RWD:
From a forum, no less... I pointed out these guys have no knowledge of local AUVs. But still:for FWD vs RWD or even AWD comparison, this would help :cheers:
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/forum...-vs-awd-2.html
An oblique reference to us? Eh? You're now arguing just for the sake of arguing.
And then bring up another car not in the discussion:
Which I responded to: Indonesian made, crap quality, poor gearbox... (oh, yes, we had one, too) but I reminded you that even some Japanese rear-drive vans had issues with the drivetrain... and they overheated more often... (we had a Vanette. It was worse. I'd rather have the MB100).remember the introduction of the MB100 (FWD) in the 90's? it was selling like hotcakes because of its size, price, and the MB badge but after a few years it was discontinued. Why?
Then you started grasping at straws:
This is the single worst piece of automotive writing I've ever seen on the internet... almost as bad as those 9-11 conspiracy sites. I'd still like to see proof that your tires will lock up whenever you let off the gas pedal. Maybe the guy downshifts into first at 100 km/h when he lets off the gas... :hysterical:
Errh... who said what?
While I enjoy arguing for the sake of arguing, this isn't the place for it... and you're just going in circles for the sake of arguing.
-
If you prefer RWD, you prefer RWD. But don't invent reasons that don't exist for why the Avanza is better than the Vios.
-
I'd actually consider an Avanza 1.5 over a Vios 1.5 if I needed a family car. An Avanza 1.3 5-seater over a Vios? No. The 1.3 has really cheap interiors, it rattles, it squeaks, the engine struggles to carry a full-load (but it can, if it needs to... only issue is fuel consumption when you fill up the cargo bay), the handling is tippy and the body is tinny compared to the more crash-worthy Vios.
Fini. End. Finis.







Reply With Quote
