Well first thing aside.. this is one unrealistic test lol.
The results are to be published tomorrow. But heres one article about the "test"
http://www.autoindustriya.com/featur...onomy-run.html
Well first thing aside.. this is one unrealistic test lol.
The results are to be published tomorrow. But heres one article about the "test"
http://www.autoindustriya.com/featur...onomy-run.html
Tama lang naman sa midnight sila tumakbo. Imaging the added 70+ cars sa rush hour. Puro reklamo mga tao nyan. Comparison lang kung anong mas ok na car
as i understood it, the test was designed to compare relative fuel efficiencies of the various cars, driven under the the exactsame conditions.
Did you see the road map? Who drives 300km * 80kph in wee hours?
Thats why i prefer jc08 and adr and epa numbers for vehicles. Their testing methodology includes city fuel consumption. Not as slow as our traffic though. Still a better gauge than this rather unrealistic eco run. Interesting nonetheless.
A Tesla would have completed this eco run without any fuel.
The best way to compare like to like is to have a set course with set acceleration markers, stop markers and speeds. Very difficult to achieve equivalent acceleration in real life... as different cars react differently to the same amount of pedal pressure... and cars also have different transmission algorithms. The best you can actually do is to run the cars on a dyno and then add in corrections for wind and tire resistance, as the EPA does it... but that is very, very expensive and time-consuming.
And then add in the cost of retrofitting fuel cells temporarily to make sure fuel use is accurately measured.
I mean, we have the knowhow and equipment to do it here... but how would you get the manufacturers to pay the costs of testing?
Me.
While I do sometimes drive faster, if I'm not late for a meeting and I don't really have a set arrival time, I do drive 80 km/h on the NLEX. Sometimes when we are doing an event at Clark or Subic, I will drive a steady 70-80 all the way home via SCTEX-NLEX-SLEX.
Great way to save money... I've gotten over 30 km/l by doing so... of course, I do spend extra on energy drinks to keep awake... but still...![]()
Last edited by niky; June 14th, 2016 at 01:06 PM.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
2016 Innova 2.8 6AT 25.25km/L
Not sure if its mt or at
How Much Money Do You Save Driving the 2 16 Toyota Innova? | ************ - Philippine Car News, Car Reviews, Car Features, Car Buyer's Guide and Car Prices.
Topgear full results
http://www.topgear.com.ph/news/indus...ef=home_feed_1
Who wants a chevy fail???? Lol
Montero sport didnt do well imo
Isuzu mux is good.
Ertiga and ciaz have the same engines imo.
The 2.8 innova shamed the 2.4 fort...
Last edited by StockEngine; June 15th, 2016 at 05:09 AM.
is this really possible? grabe katipid halos lahat especially Dmax sa test na ito. pero manila to La union madaling araw na byahe ko ilang beses narin nlex - sctex - tplex parang hindi kaya yong ganyang DOE results vs sa claim ng Car manufacturer vs sa results ng car owners?
The D-Max is likely a fluke. 20+ is indeed possible with the 3.0... have done it on the Alterra... but 38 sounds like a filling error.
-
Some of the variability can be down to unit condition, tires and even driver differences.
Civic and Elantra, remains to be seen, but if you have the right gearing, I think 20+ can be done in these two. Not sure about 27...
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
I think its not a fluke. Isuzu is king lol. Galing talaga tong mga eco run.
Brio 1.3ats cant beat its 1.5L jazz/mobilio siblings. Interesting.
HondaPH should bring in the brio 1.2 with cvts those can compete with the celerios.
I wish toyota brought the new vios to this eco run. It would have obliterated the competition![]()