saw the crv in person while i was in the states, no matter what color and angle i look at it talagang na papangitan ako.
saw the crv in person while i was in the states, no matter what color and angle i look at it talagang na papangitan ako.
You can only judge the car by your own subjective opinion of how it looks.
I guess, if you take both cars on a test drive, you'll surely find the Mazda more of a driver's car. But then, overall, which car can you live with better? Which car can earn it's love for you in the next three to five years of ownership?
Think about that... And in the end, I think you will end up a happy costumer despite every tsikoteer's opinion. =)
iam3739.com
Kasi di talaga ako kumbinsido sa hitsura ng crv...pero nung makita ko yung picture sa taas na kulay puti medyo bumawi ng konti...
Mazda CX-5 carries the skyactiv technology, newest tech Mazda has to offer. Uses GDI power plant, lightweight materials on the engine and chasis, etc. It promises better power and fuel economy. This will be the selling point of the CX-5 unless bugged by fuel quality issues(being powered by a GDI engine).
Im not sure the 2012 CRV will get a carry over power train from the current model.
Naiinis ako sa presyo ng honda. Yung 3rd generation crv nasa 1.3million pa din. Eh ano magiging presyo ng 4th generation na parating na next month?
Bagsakan presyo ng crossover/suv like sportage, montero, tucson, xtrail tapos crv nagfefeeling elite!!!
Depends on the price. CRV should be cheaper if they have a 2.0L version. I predict the price of CX-5 will be the same as CX-7 or maybe higher. But if you are mostly the driver, CX-5 is the choice, if you're the passenger, CRV wins hands down. Wala ako masabi sa rear leg room ng CRV.
Price of the new CRV will come out on Monday according to Honda Philippines. Sabay na sabay sila ng MAZDA. A lot of the extra specs are available only on the 2.4 model. Pero standard ang back up camera for all.
This thread has been quiet.![]()
Now that both have been launched, any feedback from everyone?
I'm getting my white CX-5 next week and although I love my 2006 petrol-hungry 2nd Gen CRV, I think it's time to try a new brand.
Initial feedback is the slightly high SRPs for both. Both are imported from Japan and may lack a few trims expected at the price range. I was disappointed by the lack of leather seats, back-up camera and bigger wheels for the CX-5.
Why I chose the CX-5? Maybe it's mid-life crisis.I'm now 41 and the CRV reminds me that I'm dad. The CX-5 makes me feel 10-15 years younger! Hehe!
Zoom zoom!![]()
Family friendly Honda CR-V vs. fun-to-drive Mazda CX-5
Family friendly Honda CR-V vs. fun-to-drive Mazda CX-5
Apr 26, 2012 1:30 PM
The redesigned Honda CR-V and new Mazda CX-5 appear to have a lot in common. These small SUVs seat five passengers, are of similar size, and cost about the same. So far so good. But when we dig deeper, two distinct personalities emerge.
The CR-V is more of a family-oriented model than the Mazda. Our $26,455 EX trim has a large, easy-to-access back seat, plenty of cargo room, and a standard backup camera. Hondas have a well-deserved reputation for smooth, fuel-efficient powertrains, and the new CR-V delivers. We measured 23 mpg overall, making it competitive among small SUVs. Plus, with 185 horsepower, it's no slouch off the line. And if a comfortable ride is high on your priority list, the CR-V is among the best small SUV choices.
On the other hand, if you're looking for a fun-to-drive small SUV, the CX-5 has it all over the CR-V. We found the Mazda athletic and engaging, with responsive steering and well-contained body lean that remains unfazed in bumpy corners. And even with a high fun factor, the CX-5 also delivers the best fuel economy in its class - 25 mpg overall -thanks to Mazda's new Skyactiv technology. And despite the sporty demeanor, the rear seat is surprisingly roomy. One surprise: our midlevel Touring trim line also included a blind-spot monitoring system, a feature not usually found in a $27,000 vehicle.
But as good as the CR-V and CX-5 are, the Toyota RAV4 and Subaru Forester still outscore them. How, you may ask? The Mazda is hurt by a noisy cabin, a taut ride on the highway, and an underpowered feeling engine during routine driving. The CR-V's downsides include excessive road noise, large rear corner blind zones caused by the styling, and less than tidy at-the-limit handling.
How much is the CX5 again?
The CRV looks bigger in pictures, but I'd doubt if the difference is absolutely relevant in terms of interior space. The CX5 definitely lacks a bigger set of wheels, it looks ugly sporting that small-ish compact-like rims. So if you're planning to make it really good, consider changing the rims first.
Aesthetically-wise the CRV wins (personal opinion). But with its entry price, I find it a bit disappointing since I can't find any features that could justify the hefty price point.
Mazda makes solid vehicles, so I could really bet that the CX5 will be a joy to drive around town.