Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 176
June 14th, 2010 03:03 PM #1pls help us decide. both brand new. apples and oranges i know but price difference is less than 10k. plan to keep whichever car for at least 6 years so long term maintenance cost will be an issue. so will resale value. other considerations we should look at?
thanks in advance.
-
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 194
June 14th, 2010 03:18 PM #3good for 6 years? long term maintenance and resale value? vios na po, imho. research pa po and test drive din both para mas makapag-isip kayo.
-
Certified MB Addict
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 2,284
-
June 14th, 2010 07:09 PM #5
Yun lang.
Medyo may kamahalan maintenance ng honda, pero sa looks ... panalo talaga.
Pangit na talaga kasi ang Vios ngayon, tsaka 85hp paired with an automatic transmission ?
-
June 15th, 2010 10:31 PM #6
For me, Lancer gets more points. Full sized 1.6 yan and AT ... compared to just 1.3.
In general, Honda is a bit overpriced, mainly because of its earlier successful innovations in engine technology, which now other car brands have already caught up .
...My two cents worth.
-
June 16th, 2010 06:13 PM #7
ill take the vios in terms of resale and parts. though lancer is bigger and tested cvt tranny, vios will always command a higher resale because its toyota.
-
June 17th, 2010 01:29 AM #8
Mas bagay ata Mitsubishi sa Maguindanao?
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5rRY2ICT4k&playnext_from=TL&videos=Izc5oC Ez0eY"]YouTube- Mitsubishi Evo vs British Army part 1 - Top Gear - BBC[/ame]
considering a Ferrari has an average price range of 20-25M. multiply that with 666 units sold then...
Car Sales Data (2024)