New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    176
    #1
    pls help us decide. both brand new. apples and oranges i know but price difference is less than 10k. plan to keep whichever car for at least 6 years so long term maintenance cost will be an issue. so will resale value. other considerations we should look at?

    thanks in advance.

  2. Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    21,667
    #2
    neither.

    1.3 City A/T, pwede pa. kung abot ng budget.

  3. Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    194
    #3
    good for 6 years? long term maintenance and resale value? vios na po, imho. research pa po and test drive din both para mas makapag-isip kayo.

  4. Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,284
    #4
    Vios pa din.

  5. Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    21,667
    #5
    Yun lang.

    Medyo may kamahalan maintenance ng honda, pero sa looks ... panalo talaga.

    Pangit na talaga kasi ang Vios ngayon, tsaka 85hp paired with an automatic transmission ?

  6. Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    74
    #6
    For me, Lancer gets more points. Full sized 1.6 yan and AT ... compared to just 1.3.
    In general, Honda is a bit overpriced, mainly because of its earlier successful innovations in engine technology, which now other car brands have already caught up .
    ...My two cents worth.

  7. Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,179
    #7
    ill take the vios in terms of resale and parts. though lancer is bigger and tested cvt tranny, vios will always command a higher resale because its toyota.

  8. Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,459
    #8
    Mas bagay ata Mitsubishi sa Maguindanao?

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5rRY2ICT4k&playnext_from=TL&videos=Izc5oC Ez0eY"]YouTube- Mitsubishi Evo vs British Army part 1 - Top Gear - BBC[/ame]

2010 Vios 1.3E A/T or 2010 Lancer 1.6 GLS CVT