View Poll Results: 2008 IS-F, BMW M3, Audi RS4 and 2009 Caddy CTS-V
- Voters
- 29. You may not vote on this poll
-
2008 IS-F
5 17.24% -
2008 BMW M3
16 55.17% -
2008 Audi RS4
8 27.59% -
2009 Caddy CTS-V
4 13.79%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 10 of 22
-
Tsikot Member Rank 4
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 1,046
January 22nd, 2008 02:46 PM #1if all of them were available right now, which car would you buy?
Lexus IS-F
5.0 Liter V8
416 hp
371 lb-ft. of torque
rear wheel drive
Base price: $56,000
click here for pic/s: http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1...20118183-E.jpg
Audi RS4
4.2 Liter V8
420 hp
317 lb-ft of torque
all wheel drive
Base price: $69,785
click here for pic/s:
http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1...20125825-E.jpg
BMW M3
4.0 Liter V8
414 hp
295 lb-ft of torque
rear wheel drive
Base price: $57,725 (coupe); $54,575 (sedan)
both variants will have a gas guzzler tax
click here for pic/s:
http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1...20117147-E.jpg
Cadillac CTS-V
6.2 Liter V8 supercharged based from the upcoming ZR1
550 hp
550 lb-ft of torque
Base price: TBA; 2007 Base price was $53,000+
click here for pic/s:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...topanel..2.*#8
iff ALL of them were available right now, my two top picks would be the CTS-V and the IS-F.
I made the CTS-V as my first pick, because it has the best interior styling (in my opinion) and the 550 hp is an added bonus.
next is the IS-F. picking it over the M3 was a bit difficult especially after seeing the msrp for both cars were officially announced two weeks ago. the deciding factor of my picking the IS-F is the fact that the base model offers more standard items, which are offered as options on the stripped out base model of the M3 (typical of BMW)
-
January 22nd, 2008 03:58 PM #2
I'd go for the BMW M3, its the lightest, probably the most agile and the best handling of the bunch.
Coming soon, BMW's 7-speed double-clutch "M DKG" Transmission.
It will trim the M3's 0-100km/h time by 0.2 sec.
An M3 with a 6-speed manual has a 0-100km/h time of 4.8 sec and a 0-60mph time of 4.6 sec.
Some useless weight adding luxury gadgets may not be standard on the M3, but all the performance enhancements expected from the legendary BMW M-cars are there.
The CTS-V has no official test yet, but judging from its bigger size and extra weight, its probably not as agile... the CTS-V was also tested/tuned in Nurburgring so it should also handle well.Last edited by AG4; January 22nd, 2008 at 04:05 PM.
-
TheOneThatIs
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Posts
- 1,306
January 22nd, 2008 04:15 PM #3Bakit hindi kasama yung C63?
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._benz_c63_amg/
-
January 22nd, 2008 04:25 PM #4
I'dve said M3 in a heartbeat a few years ago... and if it were as a second car or as a weekend toy, I'd still probably go for one.
But I find the C63 an oddly attractive package... huge V8, small car... terrific looks.
Hell... give me both... and an RS4 wagon, to boot. :lol:
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
January 23rd, 2008 01:17 AM #5
Unfortunately the RS4 is now out of production. Much as I want to vote for that, I can't because I can't get one...
I'll vote for the underdog: the CTS-V. The car's massively improved over the first CTS and the present base model, which were pretty good by themselves.
-
Tsikot Member Rank 4
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 1,046
January 23rd, 2008 02:55 AM #6
-
Tsikot Member Rank 4
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 1,046
-
-
January 23rd, 2008 07:52 PM #9
-
Daming issue ng SU7:grin:
Xiaomi E-Car