Lancer MX 2005 CVT a/t VS Ford Lynx RS 2004

[mickoolitz]

In terms of Fuel Efficiency, which one has the advantage? and also over all performance.

Thanks!

[renzo_d10]

Get the Lancer MX if you want a higher resale value. But if the CVT breaks down it will cost you a lot for it to be repaired. I like the Lynx's style.....but if you wont mind the resale value for like 5 years or so, get the Lynx

[mey0r]

In terms of Fuel Efficiency, which one has the advantage? and also over all performance.

Thanks!

mas magnda performance ng CVT compaired sa traditional AT. FC wise, advantage pa rin CVT.

[1D4LV]

fuel efficiency, CVTS have better efficiency results than conventional ATs.
but based on your choices, i would go for the Lynx RS.... ganda neto eh.
kaya lang, really drinks gas.

[mey0r]

fuel efficiency, CVTS have better efficiency results than conventional ATs.
but based on your choices, i would go for the Lynx RS.... ganda neto eh.
kaya lang, really drinks gas.

1.8 6-speed yung MX while 2.0 5 AT yung RS. pero sa looks, advantage para sakin yung RS.

[mey0r]

Hope this helps. Here are the past reviews.

RS - http://www.autoindustriya.com/tested/id/17/
MX - http://www.autoindustriya.com/tested/id/31/

[mickoolitz]

salamat sa mga reply!

manual tranny pala itong Lynx RS, I don't know if you can compare it side by side (a/t vs m/t). Pero I read some forums over the net na FC ng Lynx is 8-9km/L, how much ba sa Lancer MX?

Anyways, is it safe to buy a 2nd hand lancer MX? I was wondering if the a/t has a lifespan. It was mentioned above that it wil cost me alot to repair a CVT, kaya I kind of doubted choosing the Lancer.. hehehe! thanks again!