Results 11 to 20 of 26
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Posts
- 844
September 26th, 2013 07:28 AM #11With the current choices, I'll choose the MS GLX simply because of its lower price range. 1.208M for MT and 1.308M yata for AT. Still, more or less 200k cheaper than a Fort 2.5 or the Everest.
Comparing Fort 2.5G and MS GLX will be better since price difference is smaller.
To TS, I agree with most posts here that it all boils down to your preference.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Posts
- 152
September 26th, 2013 10:33 AM #12
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 6,237
September 26th, 2013 11:43 AM #13One of the main reasons I dislike the Fort is the cramped interior, despite the bulky looking exterior. Being pretty much the same car from 2005, no amount of facelifts and redesigns can change that. Ceiling mounted air vents make for limited headroom especially for the 2nd and 3rd row. Legroom is also virtually non-existent in the 3rd row!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
-
September 26th, 2013 10:58 PM #14
Chief, si yours truly did not even suggest off-roading on either of the three SUVs on enquiry, even car racing at may Dakar rally pa hehe
Huwag kang magalit if mga tao na Monty owners (kung Monty owner ka man chief), gaya noong gentleman sa TG Phils ay sinasabi lamang ang pawang katotohanan at nai-emphasised niya ito sa letter na sinagot naman ni Mr. Lao at pinatibay pa ang pagka-anemic nito.... Si yours truly ay nag-rerelay lang naman ng credible findings sa tao concerning one of his choices, which is the Montysport. At available naman ang info sa TG Phils.
Huwag ka na mainis sa mga taong nagsasabi ng totoo, kase katotohanan yan eh hehe.... Di ba nagsusubaybay ka diyan sa Pinas re pork barrel trial to find out the truth? Ganoon din yan sa taong gagastos ng mahigit isang million para sa SUV.... Kaya relax ka lang idol
Cheers!
Last edited by d_mac; September 26th, 2013 at 11:02 PM.
-
September 27th, 2013 01:20 AM #15
No body is angry with anybody boss. this just purely for discussion purposes. I was just reminding everybody not to make this thread a contest between who's car is better and to stick with what the TS is asking for. And I'm not a monty owner and as you can see from my previous comment that I said i'll go w/ either 1 or 2. that means I also like the Fort.
Nakita ko kasi sa ibang thread na kung minsan na hi-jack na yung topic nung TS and it became like a boxing match nang mga car fanatics.
I apologize if I might've sounded angry but trust me, I wasn't. :2thumbsup:
-
September 27th, 2013 01:47 AM #16
I have a fortuner 3.0 v 4x4 before its the best in terms of power, looks. Matagtag talaga ang fortuner matagal na alam ng lahat pero nasanay ako. Sa fuel consumption 6-7kms/liter. But now my suv is a monterosport gls-v. Ride, fuel consumption, space sa interior lamang si montero. Power almost the same. But im happy with my montero because of the fuel consumption at the same time with power.
Sent from my S3 using tapatalk 2
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 27
September 27th, 2013 07:49 AM #17I owned both before and to be honest, ai think mas malaki interior space ng fort compared to montero except for the 3rd row
-
September 27th, 2013 08:49 AM #18
mas malaki interior space ng fort sa montero. smallest interior space nga ang montero sa 3 choices ng TS e.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 406
September 27th, 2013 10:37 AM #19Go for the 2.5V fortuner, classier interior and exterior. The 2.5G Fortuner is worth a look as well (no leather seats, HID, headlamp washers and GPS) but still has the same vnt engine. Everest is due for a replacement soon. Montero has cheap plastics and is pretty cramped in terms of elbow room. I also agree with the lack of low-end torque even for the V variant.
-
October 13th, 2013 11:00 PM #20
The only reason you're getting the monty is because it rides so well. That's it.
Daming issue ng SU7:grin:
Xiaomi E-Car