New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 60 of 98

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,668
    #1
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aut...cer-2-0-gt/amp

    2006 Lancer 2.0 is 4AT.
    CVTs of yesteryears are limited to 1.6L and below engine power.

    High torque CVTs are first used by nissan suvs after 2010, i think.

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk

  2. Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,130
    #2
    Quote Originally Posted by istan View Post
    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aut...cer-2-0-gt/amp

    2006 Lancer 2.0 is 4AT.
    CVTs of yesteryears are limited to 1.6L and below engine power.

    High torque CVTs are first used by nissan suvs after 2010, i think.

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk
    Oh sh*t. It was a 4AT? They told me it had a CVT and I really believed it was a CVT back then because it felt so rubber band-ey. Well I guess that was a battle of torque converter trannies then. We also own a 1.6L lancer but we chose the manual because the CVT was fairly new back then and we didn’t want to experiment with a new tech.

    But the 2008 2.0 lancer EX as I recall had a CVT.

  3. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #3
    Quote Originally Posted by SidCoronel View Post
    Agreed.

    Bear in mind also that different AT gens require different driving styles. For example, DCTs should be placed on N and D intermittently when in Makatigtype rush hour traffic

    CVT's should be accelerated gradually, Jack rabbit starts will kill it

    True to all trannys, regular and correct ATF grade is a must.
    Who said you can't accelerate quickly with a CVT? The turbo-powered Subarus and Hondas are quite quick. Have you driven one?

    Quote Originally Posted by hardwang View Post
    Oh sh*t. It was a 4AT? They told me it had a CVT and I really believed it was a CVT back then because it felt so rubber band-ey. Well I guess that was a battle of torque converter trannies then. We also own a 1.6L lancer but we chose the manual because the CVT was fairly new back then and we didn’t want to experiment with a new tech.

    But the 2008 2.0 lancer EX as I recall had a CVT.
    Lancer Cedia ba? They do have CVTs. I am not sure though if Mitsubishi used different trannies on their 1.6L and 2.0L Cedia models.

    The Lancer from 2008 onwards have CVT and so with the ASX.

  4. Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,130
    #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Egan101 View Post
    Who said you can't accelerate quickly with a CVT? The turbo-powered Subarus and Hondas are quite quick. Have you driven one?
    CVTs are quick no doubt, quicker than any torque converters. The civic for example, even with lower power figures is noticeably faster than the focus ecoboost which has higher power figures but uses a torque converter.

    I guess what he’s probably trying to say is jack rabbit starts will shorten the lifespan of CVTs.

  5. Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,320
    #5
    Quote Originally Posted by hardwang View Post
    CVTs are quick no doubt, quicker than any torque converters. The civic for example, even with lower power figures is noticeably faster than the focus ecoboost which has higher power figures but uses a torque converter.

    I guess what he’s probably trying to say is jack rabbit starts will shorten the lifespan of CVTs.
    Hard Acceleration basically, especially from a standstill/crawl. =)

  6. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,398
    #6
    Quote Originally Posted by hardwang View Post
    CVTs are quick no doubt, quicker than any torque converters. The civic for example, even with lower power figures is noticeably faster than the focus ecoboost which has higher power figures but uses a torque converter.

    I guess what he’s probably trying to say is jack rabbit starts will shorten the lifespan of CVTs.
    It's the long-term durability of a CVT I'm concerned about. My wife has a 1st gen 2013 Nissan Rogue and it's fairly peppy for a 170 hp CUV, probably 8 sec 0-60 mph. But, I baby it because if the CVT goes, I'd have to spend several thousand $$$ for a new one. No problems so far. But, I have heard all the horror stories.

    You don't repair a CVT. A bad one is replaced with a new one. Ouch.

    I always remind my wife she should've picked my choice back then: the 1st gen, 157hp CX-5.
    Last edited by Jun aka Pekto; July 26th, 2019 at 08:53 PM.

  7. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,668
    #7
    2004-2008 models, 1.6L cvt, 2.0L 4AT.
    Ex models 2008 up, 2.0L cvt, 1.6L 4at

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk

  8. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #8
    Aside from the faulty Powershift DCT of Ford, most issues are in some ways attributed to neglect of owners in proper maintenance. As mentioned, failures in CVT cars are less than 1%.

    Manufacturers have now started doing extended warranties to deal with issues not easily found within the first 3 years or 60k miles (100k ) of ownership.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

DCT and CVT, which car has one?