Results 31 to 40 of 96
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2018
- Posts
- 27
June 22nd, 2018 05:55 PM #31Thanks boss. the recent IIHS report (and videos) compelled me to look for a car with more than 2 airbags actually so I’m afraid in the case of airbags I would default to more is better? If I can find a well-built car with more than 2 airbags that would be great. Kia sorento got the best rating but locally available units do not have the same safety features as the units they tested hehe.
I was thinking of getting a sedan instead since flooding is only a few weeks out of the year. This thread gave me a lot to think about.
Thanks po ulit for the references, I will check them out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 6,237
June 22nd, 2018 06:44 PM #32As you have probably seen with the side overlap tests of IIHS, most of the cars failed, despite the full host of airbags. Full frontal impact tests deployed by Asean NCAP and ANCAP seem to be more realistic though, and cover more models available in the local market.
Personally, with my own cars, I am perfectly fine with 2 airbags. Heck, I am fine with no airbags. I have survived all these years, thank God, without ever having seen one deploy let alone have one deploy on me. We have a 21 year old converted Granvia. It still has its 21 year old airbags. [emoji28] I am much more particular with braking performance, and appreciate the presence of ABS more. Same goes with tire condition. And seatbelts. I have never driven off without buckling up.
I have nothing against the Innova. Excellent appliance car with generous specs and an excellent engine. Easier ingress/egress versus an SUV plus similar wading depth are great points of consideration. Sharing components with the Fortuner and Hilux, it would also be easy to increase ride height, or even fit a snorkel if you want. Just that its not as "cool" as an SUV, and I wonder if it would be your parents' "type".
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2014
- Posts
- 2,536
-
June 30th, 2018 02:04 AM #34I would personally choose the BRV since its transmission is a CVT and a 7 speed automatic na rin po
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 52,731
June 30th, 2018 09:33 AM #35with the arrival of CVT, some potential buyers now look at the standard 4AT as leprechaunous and "must be voided at all costs".
whatever advantage the CVT has over the 4AT, is, in my opinion, not that much of a deal-breaker, just like the absence-of-reverse-cam issue.Last edited by dr. d; June 30th, 2018 at 09:49 AM.
-
June 30th, 2018 10:53 AM #36
CVTs were used primarily for fuel efficiency.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 52,731
June 30th, 2018 02:36 PM #37
-
June 30th, 2018 02:48 PM #38
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 52,731
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Posts
- 12
July 1st, 2018 11:12 PM #40any feedback 2008 outlander vs xtrail? for example same price and same good condition
Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using Tapatalk
Choice I would have made as well.:nod:
2024 Innova Zenix 2.0 V CVT (non-HEV) vs Innova...