New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Results 1 to 20 of 3070

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    45
    #1
    Quote Originally Posted by joey36b View Post
    Kung 4ch amp pareho mlamang same lang, sonus kabisado ni sir jhnkvn dont know lang kung ano connector if rca din


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Oh okay thanks sir joey36b!
    Finally decided nako sa amp(sana makuha ko na bukas) and sa deadening. May iba pa ba kayo ma suggest na ok na 2way seps around 12k php? (aside from DLS/Focal) Gusto ko yung sound ng DLS reference pero baka may iba pa po kayo alam na mas ok? Para ma try ko rin. and sa cables, generic kasi ata rin nakakbit sakin or audiomax ata yun di ko sure. Sulit ba yung 5k na gagastusin para mag upgrade sa stinger? Or wag na? Thanks

  2. Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,527
    #2
    *Lzarellano
    Re: Cables
    For the speaker and RCA cables, you don't need to restrict yourself to traditional "car audio" speaker and RCA cables. You can opt to look for home audio RCAs and speaker cables to broaden your choices. My philosophy in this? Thicker Cables = Better Cables. The brand name is just to assure you that their 99.99% copper isn't 85% copper and 15% ****.

    Just remember that you don't want it to be so thick that you have trouble routing it over the car's chassis. And yes, the Sonus also has analog inputs that accommodates RCA connections. Almost all or more than 95% of the amplifiers out on the market accepts RCA connectors naman ;) it's the de-facto standard in analog audio connections.

    Re: Deadeners
    The reason why I would like to opt for the cheapest butyl deadener is because the science of expensive deadeners don't make any sense given that they're the same density and thickness. Sound waves do not interact directly with the deadening material as sound waves bounce off your plastic panel unless your car is nude inside and the only way the material will interact is indirectly: (1) through the reduction of ambient sound (for example: how foam and butyl rubber "blocks" sound is different) and by reducing the panel's vibration frequency through adding weight (all it cares about is weight: you can pour concrete if you want to).

    The only reason why I advocate butyl is because it won't melt like goo unlike asphalt based deadeners. If you're annoyed by asphalt clinging to your car's paint, think of it na "bits" lang yun. What more if you have a kilogram of them inside your door.

    Re: Active Crossovers

    Old school SQ boys often use a 31-band EQ L/R (ex. a AudioControl EQX) to delay and EQ their speakers ack when time alignment and digital EQ was still in its infancy. I used to have them but has since given it a friend. The problem in using them is that tuning them is leaps more complicated and this is why I won't recommend them for the modern day user. For one, most of them have the EQ at the back. This makes tuning them a back-and-forth process and that affects one's sound judgement. Not only that but they also add another "problem" in the signal chain and they're prime culprits in causing ground loops and whines (for incorrect installations).


    *crazy_boy

    Engine whine. That's a bitch to fix so it's best to let the CASA do it since they'll be tearing it down. In a nutshell, a cable "somewhere" is being affected. I'll especially look at the coaxial connection between the HU and the amplifier.


    *ninjababez

    Re: Amp at Rear Deck
    Hmm, not the first time I've seen one to be honest. I don't see a problem with it if you have a tint and normally park your car over at the shade but I'll raise the NO flag if you're running it without tints and expose it to the sun. While amplifiers don't mind running at high temperatures (mine's like.. 70-80 degrees Celsius at any time), a closed cabin + direct sunlight + metal chassis doesn't bode well for any electronic device. In short, just cover it and you can throw it at your rear.

    There's also some cons in bolting your amplifier on your subwoofer box. Specifically, the vibration it entails.


    Re: Subwoofer Bouncing

    Clamp it down. Most car audio installs involve drilling it and clamping it to the car's chassis.
    Last edited by jhnkvn; April 18th, 2017 at 08:09 PM.

  3. Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    45
    #3
    [QUOTE=jhnkvn;2822003]*Lzarellano
    Re: Cables
    For the speaker and RCA cables, you don't need to restrict yourself to traditional "car audio" speaker and RCA cables. You can opt to look for home audio RCAs and speaker cables to broaden your choices. My philosophy in this? Thicker Cables = Better Cables. The brand name is just to assure you that their 99.99% copper isn't 85% copper and 15% ****.

    Just remember that you don't want it to be so thick that you have trouble routing it over the car's chassis. And yes, the Sonus also has analog inputs that accommodates RCA connections. Almost all or more than 95% of the amplifiers out on the market accepts RCA connectors naman ;) it's the de-facto standard in analog audio connections.

    Re: Deadeners
    The reason why I would like to opt for the cheapest butyl deadener is because the science of expensive deadeners don't make any sense given that they're the same density and thickness. Sound waves do not interact directly with the deadening material as sound waves bounce off your plastic panel unless your car is nude inside and the only way the material will interact is indirectly: (1) through the reduction of ambient sound (for example: how foam and butyl rubber "blocks" sound is different) and by reducing the panel's vibration frequency through adding weight (all it cares about is weight: you can pour concrete if you want to).

    The only reason why I advocate butyl is because it won't melt like goo unlike asphalt based deadeners. If you're annoyed by asphalt clinging to your car's paint, think of it na "bits" lang yun. What more if you have a kilogram of them inside your door.

    Re: Active Crossovers

    Old school SQ boys often use a 31-band EQ L/R (ex. a AudioControl EQX) to delay and EQ their speakers ack when time alignment and digital EQ was still in its infancy. I used to have them but has since given it a friend. The problem in using them is that tuning them is leaps more complicated and this is why I won't recommend them for the modern day user. For one, most of them have the EQ at the back. This makes tuning them a back-and-forth process and that affects one's sound judgement. Not only that but they also add another "problem" in the signal chain and they're prime culprits in causing ground loops and whines (for incorrect installations).


    Thanks sir jhnkvn, clear na talaga now yung sa cables and deadeners (kahit ilang beses na ko nag backread sa thread na to haha) Yung kailangan ko po sana na crossover ay para lang sa HPF at LPF ng mids at tweeters. Meron po kasi sa HU ko ng ganun pero walang LPF yung front at rear channel tapos hanggang 200hz lang sya. Yung concern ko nga lang sa electronic crossover is baka nga yung prob sa signal. So ibig sabihin pass nalang sa active crossover? At mas ok na mag DSP nalang talaga? If ganun stick nalang muna ako sa passive na setup hehe no budget para sa DSP ) Yung recommended kasi sa seps na bibilhin ko ay gawing active dahil wide yung tweeter (DLS rz6.2)

audio set-up for beginners [continued]