New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 189

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1
    #1
    After spending an additional hour traversing the traffic caused by the construction of the elevated U-turn (northbound to southbound) along the C-5/Kalayaan intersection (well that's what I surmised from the billboard), It got me thinking what could be the logic behind it when there is already an existing Exit (Market!Market!) just a few hundred meters before this area for northbound vehicles to make a U-turn towards Makati. IMHO, it might have been better if the multi-million project was just a regular fly-over crossing Kalayaan where it could be used by a bigger volume of vehicles traversing C5....also,it will create a U-turn slot below the fly-over anyway.

    Just wanna share my thoughts...if there is no perfect logic for the design, then it's sad to see taxpayers money used ineffeciently and maybe somebody should stop it. I sincerly hope that I'm wrong...for my peace of mind.

  2. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    4,085
    #2
    same thoughts with bmwboxxercup.. minsan talaga may sablay din si bayani..

    C-5 Kalayaan is better off with the same system that EDSA-Quezon Ave. is using.

    Fly-over interchange for Kalayaan and Underpass for C-5 or vise versa.

  3. Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,186
    #3
    Nasa "prototyping stage" pa lang ng experiment. Kung makatulong (sana nga) magsusulputa ng parang kabute.

    Ang logic kasi daw ay nag work sa ibang bansa. So dapat din daw ay mag work dito sa atin. (sana nga)

    Now habang ginagawa, laking pahirap sa akin .

  4. Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    120
    #4
    ya, likewise, i would think a simple flyover across kalayaan would do better. since i think there are much more volume of cars going c5 (south-north-south) than the c5 making an u-turn.

    pass by there last night.. grabe ang traffic caused by the construction. it was even worse in the morning, we had to turn back to edsa..

  5. Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    70
    #5
    the concept seemed workable nung umpisa, pero parang medyo malabo nga. tapos outside lane pa siya, so baka maging pick-up/drop-off ng mga jeep (like the C5-Katipunan flyover)

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    40,599
    #6
    whether it will work or not, wala naman tayong magagawa since naumpisahan na yan, and have BF ever reconsidered his plans? never! kahit palapk pa yan impossibleng bawiin niya yan, papangatawanan na niya yan, just like the fences and the concrete lane separators along EDSA...

    and siyempre the more project na nagagawa, more money....

  7. Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    550
    #7
    Will it help? Marginally, yes. Though they should have just pushed thru with the DPWH's original plan. They spent billions constructing the whole of C5, billions (on Japanese loan grants) on the Ortigas-C5 flyover, then they scrimp on this. Sayang.
    Quote Originally Posted by kiper View Post
    same thoughts with bmwboxxercup.. minsan talaga may sablay din si bayani..

    C-5 Kalayaan is better off with the same system that EDSA-Quezon Ave. is using.

    Fly-over interchange for Kalayaan and Underpass for C-5 or vise versa.
    I understand that this was DPWH's original plan. The implementation was delayed year after year due to right of way problems and the bureaucracy. Fernando came in with a much 'cheaper' alternative and GMA gave the nod.

  8. Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    494
    #8
    Delayed infrastructure projects are direct consequences of excessive investigative work by legislative bodies and by government executives both local and national dipping their dirty fingers in other people's money.

    BF is just doing something outside the box because the bureaucratic box has become a snakepit.

  9. Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    457
    #9
    kung ako si BF tatanggalin ko lang franchise ng jeepney solb na yan di na kelangan ng u-turn

  10. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    2,043
    #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Radical! View Post
    Will it help? Marginally, yes. Though they should have just pushed thru with the DPWH's original plan. They spent billions constructing the whole of C5, billions (on Japanese loan grants) on the Ortigas-C5 flyover, then they scrimp on this. Sayang.


    I understand that this was DPWH's original plan. The implementation was delayed year after year due to right of way problems and the bureaucracy. Fernando came in with a much 'cheaper' alternative and GMA gave the nod.
    This is true. Several years ago pa dapat nag start yung proposed DPWH flyover in C-5 kalayaan but rumor has it BF was Blocking its implementation. BF instead proposed this elevated U-turn which supposedly costs less than a full flyover but implemented by the MMDA instead of the DPWH. So you know who gets what.
    This U-turn would work if the PUV, buses and jeepneys don't block the entrance or exit ramps of the U-turn. But as you know those undisciplined drivers will always do this making the elevated U-turn less likely to succeed.
    The middle island of the C-5 kalayann intersection is being removed so that the C-5 in itself will be wider when completed.

  11. Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,283
    #11
    I think common sense lang naman ang kailangan dito which sadly MR. MMDA doesn't have, common sense dictates that what we need is a flyover in the C5/Kalayaan area and not some stupid elevated u-turn ramp. Kung hindi lang hinarang ni BF yan noon eh di sana tapos na ang kalbaryo nating mga motorista.

  12. Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    478
    #12
    Dapat talaga dun, flyover na lang. Long-term solution, rather than an elevated u-turn slot. Waste of time and money. Furthermore, we need also to discipline our fellow drivers, especially those in the public transpo category.

  13. Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    457
    #13
    Quote Originally Posted by ale828 View Post
    This is true. Several years ago pa dapat nag start yung proposed DPWH flyover in C-5 kalayaan but rumor has it BF was Blocking its implementation. BF instead proposed this elevated U-turn which supposedly costs less than a full flyover but implemented by the MMDA instead of the DPWH. So you know who gets what.
    This U-turn would work if the PUV, buses and jeepneys don't block the entrance or exit ramps of the U-turn. But as you know those undisciplined drivers will always do this making the elevated U-turn less likely to succeed.
    The middle island of the C-5 kalayann intersection is being removed so that the C-5 in itself will be wider when completed.

    nope. it was Binay who was opposing the idea not bec. he did not want a flyover. he contested over who has jurisdiction of the intersection, Taguig, Makati, Pasig or MMDA. kaya mga 2-3 years ago, may mga MAPSA pa as far that area

    kaya dahil dun hindi malagyan-lagyan ng flyover yan. now that Binay has been weakened sa sunod-sunod na banat ng Administration, nakakilos na sila BF and GMA, sa wakas nakakilos din

  14. Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    20
    #14
    I agree with the threadstarter. How many people actually use those U-turn slots on C5 in that area? Why make a U-turn there when you can just go under the bridge before Kalayaan?

    A flyover that goes directly over Kalayaan would've been much more effecient. If not, then just allow people to turn left/right at the intersection. In other words, fix the stoplights! Make sure the synchronization and timing are correct to allow good traffic flow.

  15. Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    884
    #15
    Elevated U-turn at C-5/Kalayaan: will it help?
    No it won't!!!


    imagine niyo nalang, week day, summer sem break ang school walang pasok ang mga estudyante... dumaan ka sa C5 - Libis anytime, makikita niyo ang traffic umaabot mula kalayaan C5 hanggan St. Ignacius Village... Bwesit...

    ARAW ARAW NALANG GANYAN...

    sobrang STUPIDO ang nag pakana niyan bwesit na U-Turn sa C5, at sa lahat ng U-Turn na nakakalat sa Metro Manila...

    sa LAGAY na iyan eh MAGKANO KAYA ang COMMISSION MO???

    siyanga pala wala pa 2010, pumoporma na, feeling METRO GWAPO KUNO... MAGKANO NGA BA ULIT ANG COMMISSION NIYO SA PAG PAGAWA NG TARPULINE???



    eto para sa iyo,
    gusto mo pa? eto ulit, ang PS at KS mo sobra...

    Labas lang ng galit/rant, araw araw kasi dumadaan dito sa C5-Libis... tsk tsk...
    Last edited by chuaed; April 6th, 2008 at 07:39 AM.

  16. Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    51
    #16
    masyadong marami na ang mga sasakyan para sa daan dito sa metro.. kung sana napigil ng konti ang bentahan ng sasakyan mas makakaluwag tayo.. kahit may flyover pa yan, pagdating sa baba bottleneck pa rin..

  17. Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    39,174
    #17

    If this one doesn't work,- they should not start another one. Sayang lang ang pera at pahirap sa mga motorista ngayon.... Iwas kami ngayon ng C5,- EDSA na lang ulit...

    5707:tumbleweed:

  18. Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,283
    #18
    Quote Originally Posted by chuaed View Post
    No it won't!!!


    imagine niyo nalang, week day, summer sem break ang school walang pasok ang mga estudyante... dumaan ka sa C5 - Libis anytime, makikita niyo ang traffic umaabot mula kalayaan C5 hanggan St. Ignacius Village... Bwesit...

    ARAW ARAW NALANG GANYAN...

    sobrang STUPIDO ang nag pakana niyan bwesit na U-Turn sa C5, at sa lahat ng U-Turn na nakakalat sa Metro Manila...

    sa LAGAY na iyan eh MAGKANO KAYA ang COMMISSION MO???

    siyanga pala wala pa 2010, pumoporma na, feeling METRO GWAPO KUNO... MAGKANO NGA BA ULIT ANG COMMISSION NIYO SA PAG PAGAWA NG TARPULINE???



    eto para sa iyo,
    gusto mo pa? eto ulit, ang PS at KS mo sobra...

    Labas lang ng galit/rant, araw araw kasi dumadaan dito sa C5-Libis... tsk tsk...

    Baka naman BF construction co. ang gagawa nyan, eh di additional kickback nanaman yan kay Mr. MMDA chairman

  19. Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    457
    #19
    a flyover will take 1-2 years to construct

    yun kay BF hanggang July lang started Feb this year

    if they succeed in this, hindi lang national budget ang natipid nila, pati time and of course, meron na sila working prototype for other bottlenecks to follow

    so I think they are really thinking as well as risking.

    I have to say magaling na efficiency manager and strategist si BF if he pulls this off

  20. Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    1,973
    #20
    passed by there this morning, bottle neck na nga dahil may on going construction etong mga jeep titigil pa tapos di pa itabi ng maayos labas pa din yung likod ng jeep so the 2 lanes becomes 1.... so solution talaga sa metro traffic... PUJ and PUB. kung sumunod lang sila sa lane markers mas bibilis at aayos takbo ng trafic.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Elevated U-turn at C-5/Kalayaan (Merged Threads)