LTO's paper license plan continues to draw fire
By Kap Maceda Aguila (The Philippine Star)
Updated September 22, 2010
MANILA, Philippines – Paper or plastic?
It seems the overwhelming, vehement answer is the latter.
The Land Transportation Office (LTO) proposal to revert to paper driver’s licenses by next year is getting a lot of fiery opposition.
Although LTO Chief Virginia Torres tried to assuage the public by saying that the new “80-percent paper base” license will be secure, durable, and environment friendly, many motorists and transportation groups have been riled by the move.
In an earlier interview with The Philippine STAR’s Rainier Allan Ronda, militant public transport group Piston (Pagkakaisa ng Samahan ng Mga Tsuper at Opereytor Nationwide) secretary general George San Mateo had derided the reversion to paper as “highly suspicious and doubtful.”
“I don’t know of any country that uses paper licenses. I can’t imagine they would last,” joins Augusto Lagman, president of the Automobile Association Philippines, the country’s biggest and oldest existing auto club. Established in 1931 and formerly known as the Philippine Motor Association, the AAP is a non-stock, non-profit organization “committed to the general welfare of motorists in the Philippines”. It boasts over 50,000 members.
In an exclusive chat with The Philippine STAR, Lagman tries to give LTO a fair shake. “They might know of efficient technology
that we are not aware of, so we are researching advantages and disadvantages of the paper form,” he continues.
Still, Lagman says that he can’t see any obvious advantage. For instance, even if security measures are put in, paper would prove to be a “fragile” medium unless laminated. And that would defeat the purpose. “I don’t know if going back to paper is a solution to security concerns. It’s even easier to fake as there are a lot of paper suppliers,” he declares.
Lagman disagrees with the LTO contention that paper licenses would be more environment friendly. “If you really want to reduce (carbon footprint), we should look at extending our license validity from three to five years – as in other countries. Studies show that significant changes in the face of a person occur after six years.” It would be a big relief for an estimated six million drivers who don’t have to keep going back to the LTO to renew their licenses, he concluded.
Dodie Gadia, a contruction specialty contractor who has been driving himself and his family around for decades, puts it simply: “The solution is to improve the quality of the card. Perhaps authorities have been prioritizing ‘tong-pats’ over the actual license construction. It’s time they focus on what’s important.”
Presumably, all the negative feedback has gotten the attention of Department of Transportation and Communications
Secretary Jose de Jesus, who has already ordered a deferment of a scheduled supply bid this week. De Jesus has also instructed LTO’s Torres to explain the planned reversion to paper.
Judging from such adverse reactions all around, the LTO paper proposal seems just about ready to go into the trash bin, or shredder.