New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,530
    #1
    https://youtu.be/w1TKVRRhsGo

    Can we do that here?

  2. Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    10
    #2
    baka mgtrigger ng lindol yan lalo na dito sa pinas

  3. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #3
    not a tree hugger, but fracking is generally a bad idea after a while
    Damn, son! Where'd you find this?

  4. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,530
    #4
    Quote Originally Posted by safeorigin View Post
    not a tree hugger, but fracking is generally a bad idea after a while
    Why is that sir?

  5. Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    10,309
    #5
    Quote Originally Posted by b_9904 View Post
    Why is that sir?
    Google is your friend.

  6. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,530
    #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter View Post
    Google is your friend.
    Common sense is not common.

    Specially true when you say google is your friend.

    Even more so, when you do not substantiate a claim.

  7. Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    10,309
    #7
    Quote Originally Posted by safeorigin View Post
    not a tree hugger, but fracking is generally a bad idea after a while
    Yes, agree with this. It's actually common sense.

  8. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,530
    #8
    Quote Originally Posted by awoooooo View Post
    baka mgtrigger ng lindol yan lalo na dito sa pinas
    No proof.

    geothermal plants causes more minor quakes.

  9. Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,711
    #9
    anything that you do below ground will have an effect above.

  10. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,530
    #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Manilablock View Post
    anything that you do below ground will have an effect above.
    Well, that depends what you do there.

    I mean, its not like every activity will affect anything.

  11. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,530
    #11
    Ito o: are cities biological dead zones for non-humans?

    https://youtu.be/4LDGzXpei8k

  12. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #12
    ^yeah, and that actually answered the questions
    Damn, son! Where'd you find this?

  13. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,530
    #13
    Quote Originally Posted by safeorigin View Post
    ^yeah, and that actually answered the questions
    It does not, but the video goes against " common sense".

    Counter-intuitive, no.

    So, you need to prove things. Not just spatter "it is common sense that it is bad."

  14. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5,994
    #14
    le sigh

    An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

    Water Quality and Quantity Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing - Springer

    Frontiers | Assessing impacts of unconventional natural gas extraction on microbial communities in headwater stream ecosystems in Northwestern Pennsylvania | Aquatic Microbiology

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    le sigh

    http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/110053

    http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40518-014-0023-4

    http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00522/abstract
    Damn, son! Where'd you find this?

  15. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,530
    #15
    Tulungan ko kayo o.

    Methane: Good Gas, Bad Gas - Pictures, More From National Geographic Magazine

    But here is a question: where have I heard the name Dimock before?

  16. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,530
    #16
    Benham Rise

    Filipinos dive into the waters of Benham Rise for the first time

    So what if, the gas in the Rise is shale gas?

    We will not frack that then?

  17. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,530
    #17
    From the Springer link:

    Third, academic research over the last four years suggests that water quality concerns associated with fracking may be more serious than water quantity concerns. The literature has identified more definitive links between shale gas development and impacts on surface water quality, and emerging research is consistent with groundwater quality impacts. The rapid pace of expansion in the industry suggests that new research aimed at quantifying water quality impacts, characterizing their pathways, and assessing options (for industry and/or policymakers) for their mitigation will have high value

  18. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,530
    #18
    Quote Originally Posted by b_9904 View Post
    From the Springer link:

    Third, academic research over the last four years suggests that water quality concerns associated with fracking may be more serious than water quantity concerns. The literature has identified more definitive links between shale gas development and impacts on surface water quality, and emerging research is consistent with groundwater quality impacts. The rapid pace of expansion in the industry suggests that new research aimed at quantifying water quality impacts, characterizing their pathways, and assessing options (for industry and/or policymakers) for their mitigation will have high value
    Are these peer reviewed?

    Was this article peer reviewed as well?

    What were the methodologies?

    What are the levels in these water contaminations? How did they isolate the contaminations so as to trace them back to drilling and fracking shale gas?

  19. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,530
    #19
    Quote Originally Posted by b_9904 View Post
    Are these peer reviewed?

    Was this article peer reviewed as well?

    What were the methodologies?

    What are the levels in these water contaminations? How did they isolate the contaminations so as to trace them back to drilling and fracking shale gas?
    Which brings us to this:

    Some evidence suggests that movement of methane from shale gas wells to groundwater wells in overlying aquifers may have occurred in the Marcellus [56–58] and Barnett shale plays [56], but these studies have been controversial and have been challenged as lacking evidence that the methane came from the fractured area. A related study in the Arkansas Fayetteville Shale did not detect evidence in groundwater of stray gas contamination, or contamination by brine [59]. Results from studies observing methane in water wells near shale gas development are consistent with well casing and cementing failures rather than upward migration from the shale formations through fracking itself (or through natural conduits) [56]. The fact that current research points to faulty casing and cementing (rather than fracking, per se) as the likely cause of observed groundwater contamination suggests the need for additional scientific and policy analysis in this area.

  20. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,530
    #20
    Quote Originally Posted by b_9904 View Post
    Which brings us to this:

    Some evidence suggests that movement of methane from shale gas wells to groundwater wells in overlying aquifers may have occurred in the Marcellus [56–58] and Barnett shale plays [56], but these studies have been controversial and have been challenged as lacking evidence that the methane came from the fractured area. A related study in the Arkansas Fayetteville Shale did not detect evidence in groundwater of stray gas contamination, or contamination by brine [59]. Results from studies observing methane in water wells near shale gas development are consistent with well casing and cementing failures rather than upward migration from the shale formations through fracking itself (or through natural conduits) [56]. The fact that current research points to faulty casing and cementing (rather than fracking, per se) as the likely cause of observed groundwater contamination suggests the need for additional scientific and policy analysis in this area.
    So, the casings and cenent failed.

    Not unique to fracking shale gas. Conventional oil drilling suffers from this as well.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Fracking is a cheap source of energy.