https://youtu.be/w1TKVRRhsGo
Can we do that here?
not a tree hugger, but fracking is generally a bad idea after a while
Damn, son! Where'd you find this?
Ito o: are cities biological dead zones for non-humans?
https://youtu.be/4LDGzXpei8k
^yeah, and that actually answered the questions
Damn, son! Where'd you find this?
le sigh
An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie
Water Quality and Quantity Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing - Springer
Frontiers | Assessing impacts of unconventional natural gas extraction on microbial communities in headwater stream ecosystems in Northwestern Pennsylvania | Aquatic Microbiology
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
le sigh
http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/110053
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40518-014-0023-4
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00522/abstract
Damn, son! Where'd you find this?
Tulungan ko kayo o.
Methane: Good Gas, Bad Gas - Pictures, More From National Geographic Magazine
But here is a question: where have I heard the name Dimock before?
Benham Rise
Filipinos dive into the waters of Benham Rise for the first time
So what if, the gas in the Rise is shale gas?
We will not frack that then?
From the Springer link:
Third, academic research over the last four years suggests that water quality concerns associated with fracking may be more serious than water quantity concerns. The literature has identified more definitive links between shale gas development and impacts on surface water quality, and emerging research is consistent with groundwater quality impacts. The rapid pace of expansion in the industry suggests that new research aimed at quantifying water quality impacts, characterizing their pathways, and assessing options (for industry and/or policymakers) for their mitigation will have high value
Which brings us to this:
Some evidence suggests that movement of methane from shale gas wells to groundwater wells in overlying aquifers may have occurred in the Marcellus [56–58] and Barnett shale plays [56], but these studies have been controversial and have been challenged as lacking evidence that the methane came from the fractured area. A related study in the Arkansas Fayetteville Shale did not detect evidence in groundwater of stray gas contamination, or contamination by brine [59]. Results from studies observing methane in water wells near shale gas development are consistent with well casing and cementing failures rather than upward migration from the shale formations through fracking itself (or through natural conduits) [56]. The fact that current research points to faulty casing and cementing (rather than fracking, per se) as the likely cause of observed groundwater contamination suggests the need for additional scientific and policy analysis in this area.