Cameras: film vs digital

[ghosthunter]

[SIZE=3]Cameras: film vs digital ... which do YOU prefer? :confused: [/SIZE]

[Ungas]

Digital... easier to process and edit.

[aifuru]

digital... sabay delete pag kahiya-hiya ang kuha...

[1D4LV]

ewan ko ba, but i still prefer film. resolution i think is still better even though mega pix na yung digicams, plus the fact that you can keep everything (kodak memories, ika nga).

for convenience, syempre, digital is best.

[hagiber]

Digital syempre.. The 3 megapixels and up models are sufficient for 99% of most people's needs. Last year, digital cameras outsold analog cameras for the first time... Yesterday, kodak announced that they were phasing out their analog cameras in North america. If you want to save your images for posterity...nothing beats digital.

[wreckless]

digital..

pero many photographers still do prefer film..

[MAXBUWAYA]

digital is a big threat for photographers

with digital everybody can shot like a pro.

5 years from now maoobselete na ang film type camera

Digital processing will rule the world!!!

[pajerokid]

Digital.

5 Megapixels are enough to blow away any doubt on picture quality.

[Karding]

for the film camera lovers...


Kodak has announced its withdrawal from the traditional-camera market in Western Europe, the US and Canada

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/eme...9119083,00.htm

[shadow]

digital all the way!!!

[BlueBimmer]

digital! so much more options sa pics mo compared to film!

[ssaloon]

digitalll... ay samsung pala yan!

pero seriously, i'd go digital... u can have ur digiphotos printed naman just like regular film... pwede mo rin ipreserve sya by burning it on a cd.

[Buzz]

di naman kasi gumagawa ng SLR camera ang Kodak thats why siguro their phasing out the 35mm compact cameras....pero kung picture quality and features sa ngayon I think the 35mm AF/AE SLR is the best pa rin..pag continous shooting upt to 10fps ata sa 35mm SLR pero sa digital 3fps lang which is lamang pa rin ans SLR 3.5fps yung standard without the motor drive....ewan ko pero pareho silang may modifications or development every year.

[pissword]

sa professional syempre maganda pa din ang film


but for us masmaganda yung digital, plus the fact na mas mura sya, 1time bigtime lang sya. yung camera lang ang babayaran mo, u dont have to buy film, pay for the processing and all that.. coz sometimes gusto lang naman natin tingnan ang mga pix, ndi naman kelangan iprint din...

so yung mga kelangan iprint un lang ang babayaran natin ,or we can print it sa bahay naman... and 1 more thing, digital instant kita agad. hehe

[Tikoyman]

digital.....daling i-edit ang pics.

[MAXBUWAYA]

its not always the megapixel sabi ng mga pro.

mas malaking factor pa din ang lens ng camera

jung bibili ka daw dapat yung lens manufacturer like CANON KODAK Minolta NIKON FUJI

SOny daw hindi pa maganda. Pangalan lang

mine is canon 1.2 MP pero pag dinevelop pareho sa mga 3.0 megapixel

tsaka dapat malaki ang bird mo

[GlennSter]

im still into the challenge of film...

but shempre..hindi naman mawawala ang digital...

[woulfe27]

digital. most didicams today pwede ka magshoot ng mini-movies with audio. mine's a canon ixus 2, 2.0MP lang pero ok naman pag nagprint sa photopaper. kakatuwa din yung mini movies

[boybi]

Originally posted by MAXBUWAYA
its not always the megapixel sabi ng mga pro.

mas malaking factor pa din ang lens ng camera

jung bibili ka daw dapat yung lens manufacturer like CANON KODAK Minolta NIKON FUJI

SOny daw hindi pa maganda. Pangalan lang

mine is canon 1.2 MP pero pag dinevelop pareho sa mga 3.0 megapixel

tsaka dapat malaki ang bird mo

kaya pala mas maganda ang mga kuha ko kesa sa wife ko, wala kasi syang bird?

[promdiboy]

digicam for me. i just bought sony T1. 5mp. pangit ba talaga ang sony compared sa ibang brands. badtrip kala ko ok ang sony. sa lens nakalagay carl zeiss ba yun kala ko better to. slim siya pero may optical zoom.