The old body glx is way way cheaper than the lancer EX glx.
The old body is 638k while the EX glx is about 800 - 900k if i am not mistaken. Yes there are several features that differ from the 2. Just not sure what is it.
IMO, if you're gonna get a lancer, i`d pick the EX anytime, aside from its new body. The kickin 2.0L is FAST! :hysterical: and not to mention it's add'tl features.
Yes. The EX GLX hasnt the rockford gate thing. Im just not sure about the ABS.
The EX GLX/GLX/MX has 16" or 15" ( not sure ) inch rims. However the EX GT/GT-A has 18" inch rims which gives riders of it a rough ride, well not that rough really.
The difference for about 200k in the price, for me is worth it if you're still in the porma/yabang stage. It's just pure aesthetics really, performance, they both do have this 2.0L engine.
If you're gonna ask me if the 200k is worth it, well my answer would be yes - if you have the budget :hysterical: - Feature wise the rin kasi and the thing that attracts people.
Last edited by renzo_d10; August 8th, 2009 at 04:58 PM.