Ombudsman files criminal raps vs ex-Arroyo justice chief
By Tetch Torres
INQUIRER.net
Last updated 05:14pm (Mla time) 01/08/2007
(UPDATE) THE OFFICE of the Ombudsman has ordered the filing of criminal charges before the anti-graft court against former justice secretary Hernando Perez, his wife Rosario, and two others for alleged “robbery-extortion.”
Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez approved the recommendation of prosecutors, who aside from Perez and his wife, found basis to charge Perez’s brother-in-law Ramon Arceo, and business associate Ernest Escaler of graft, extortion and falsification charges before the Sandiganbayan.
As of posting time, Perez has not responded to INQUIRER.net’s phone calls.
The charges stemmed from an accusation by former congressman Mark Jimenez that Perez and company had extorted $2 million in exchange for dropping him as a co-accused in the plunder case against deposed president Joseph Estrada.
Aside from extortion, the Ombudsman will also file cases of alleged graft and corruption, falsification of public documents against Perez for failing to disclose the $2 million in his statement of assets and liabilities and networth (SALN).
Gutierrez was undersecretary of the Department of Justice when Perez headed the DoJ. She then became acting justice secretary and Chief Presidential Legal Counsel before she was appointed Ombudsman in December 2005.
Based on a 66-page resolution, Gutierrez said bank documents had shown the illegal acts of Perez.
“The denial of Perez cannot overcome the positive assertion of Jimenez, more so that the charges were substantiated with convincing evidence,” the prosecutors said, referring to the $2 million that Jimenez had deposited to Coutts Bank in Hong Kong in February 2001.
Jimenez alleged that Perez had extorted money so that he would stop forcing him to execute damaging affidavits against certain individuals in the administration of Estrada, whom Jimenez had referred to as “targets” of the former justice chief.
Investigation conducted by the Ombudsman also noted that Escaler, whose HK Coutts Bank account was the initial recipient of the Jimenez fund, offered “no explanation to show that the transfer to his account was the outcome of a legitimate transaction with Jimenez.”
Contrary to their initial declaration before EFG Bank authorities that the money deposited constituted the inheritance of Rosario and Arceo, the Perezes declared in their joint counter-affidavit that the funds were proceeds of the sale, through an MOU (memorandum of understanding), of their Batangas property Malvarosa Ventures Inc. to Escaler.
However investigators discovered that the Perez-Escaler MOU was “not notarized,” and was at most a “mere private instrument” that didn’t prove at all the sale of Malvarosa.
“Indeed, it is curious that as vendee, Escaler would allow the consideration for the supposed sale to be deposited in an account held by close relations of the vendor, Perez, and over which the vendor himself had control as attorney-in-fact,” the prosecutors said.
The Ombudsman also disregarded Perez’s alibi that the amount deposited formed part of his wife’s inheritance some two years ago, because he failed to disclose such assets in the statement of assets he filed in 2001 to 2002, when he said he was worth P40 million.
“This office finds that Perez, in conspiracy with Escaler, Arceo, and Rosario Perez, took advantage of his position as the DoJ secretary by demanding Jimenez to deliver the $2 million in connection with the execution of affidavits,” the Ombudsman said.
The act of the Perez couple, Arceo, and Escaler “showed” their “united, concerted and coordinated acts of unlawfully taking the money of Jimenez, which indicate a working conspiracy among them,” making them criminally liable under the law.
Records showed that Jimenez deposited $2 million on Feb. 23, 2003 in beneficiary account HO133706 of Coutts Bank in Hong Kong, from Trade and Commerce Bank, Cayman Islands through the Chase Manhattan Bank in New York.
Bank documents provided by both Swiss and Hong Kong authorities clearly established the transfer of funds from Escaler’s HK Coutts Bank Account to the Rosario’s and Arceo’s Swiss accounts.
“No specific denial was made that Jimenez, in accordance with the instructions of Escaler, did transmit the $2 million to the account, and subsequently, Escaler transmitted the $1.7 million to Arceo-Rosario and the $250,00 to Arceo through a cheque or bank draft.”
“If indeed Rosario and Arceo had no knowledge of, nor participated in the opening of the supposed escrow accounts, then how could they have effectively served as trustees for the amount supposedly held in escrow? Perez and Escaler imply that only they were privy to the MOU as well as the escrow agreement. This renders their defense suspect,” probers said.
“Clearly, Arceo and Rosario are not strangers to Perez,” the investigators said. “All of them were privy and their acts were interdependent with each other,” they added, noting that the money was “acquired through illegal means during the incumbency of Perez.”
“Finally, while they admit having received the amount of $1.7 million, no evidence was presented to show that the amount supposedly held in escrow was duly returned to Escaler,” the Ombudsman ruled, in reference to the purported Malvarosa sale.
“Perez did not specifically deny the accusations in the complaint pertaining to the meeting in February 13 when the act of extortion was alleged,” the prosecutors likewise stressed.
($1=P48.835)


Reply With Quote

ets wait and see kung ano mangyari..
