it's a very blandly designed car but very practical. It was plenty quick and mighty handler. It is light and just sips on gas. Accomodations are quite bare but as a transpo from A to B, it will satisfy most users.
it's a very blandly designed car but very practical. It was plenty quick and mighty handler. It is light and just sips on gas. Accomodations are quite bare but as a transpo from A to B, it will satisfy most users.
well, it's a very economical car...will satisfy basic needs for family use...my dad has the same model...he bought it bnew...so far so good...he's planning on replacing it though...
used to have both the old exi and type z variant. basically same cars except for the aesthetics. bad on noise insultation, small cabin, and has a heavy clutch. other than that, i can outrun most 1.6 and some 2.0 due to its power-weight ratio. plus the fc of course. never broke down too. but for a car that old, expect some rattles and worn out parts which is common to subcompacts at that time