New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,889
    #1
    In essence, this would be the gist choosing between the 1st gen Montero Sport and a Fieldmaster Pajero, 2000 and up models?

    Looks and design
    Seating capacity
    4x4 for the MS; 4x2 for the FM

    In the 2nd-hand market, which makes a better buy?
    Need you inputs, please.

  2. Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    410
    #2
    personally i like 4x4 feature and i don't like more seats. so, it won't be hard decision for me.

  3. Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    641
    #3
    what would be your primary use of the SUV and where would you use it?
    in my opinion, having 4x4 here in Metro Manila is practically useless... i'd go for more seats.

    BUT, choosing between FM and MS, MS gets my vote. parang bland for me ang FM e.. though, i have not driven a FM yet, laging passenger lang, the MS has good handling and easy to drive.

  4. Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,326
    #4
    if I did, wouldn't it be called an MPV?

  5. Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,889
    #5

  6. Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,346
    #6
    It seems your budget is around 700+ php.

    In that money, you can get decent BNEW MPV's already. They're right, 4WD's are useless in the city but then if you have a farm, 4WD's can be essential. In water fordings or floods, a higher intake placement means better fording capability. Stock Pajero's and Monty Sport can take 500mm depth despite being 4WD or not.

    Both SUV's have the same 4M40 engines, the FM seats 9, the Montero Sport seats 5. Both sits on ladder frame so basically they're just the same.

    To meet both, a 1999 Pajero FM can be found with a 4WD feature.
    iam3739.com

Would you trade 4x4 capability for more seats?