fto vs eclipse vs mr2 vs supra

[kyk]

which would you pick?

[GerardTagayty]

supra no questions about it.... lol

[Jun aka Pekto]

which would you pick?

I had a chance to test drive a used limited edition FTO with the 200hp V6. Pretty potent for a small, light coupe. I've driven older turbo Eclipses (namely my 1g rebadged Plymouth Laser). I've also driven a acquaintance's 2g "baby Ferrari" MR2 turbo. I've never driven a Supra although I've seen plenty of them.

Stock, among the first 3, I'd take the MR2 turbo with a tie between the FTO and turbo Eclipse following very closely.

If the Supra was the last model twin turbo, I'd pick the Supra. If it's the older previous-gen, I stick with the MR2 Turbo. The previous-gen Supra would be last.

[niky]

If it's the turbo version, the MR2, hands down. The Supra, second, maybe... it's kinda heavy and not my type... plus, it'd be much more expensive than the others here.

The Eclipse would be a sight faster than the FTO, but I prefer the FTO's engine... that V6 sounds sweeeeet.

[Jun aka Pekto]

If it's a comparo, ya gotta have pics. Late 90's Mitsu FTO, mid 90's Mitsu Eclipse, Early 90's MR2, Early 90's (and last model) Supra:

[jjaammeess]

eclipse for me(hehe obvious ba).. if there's something wrong or need to be replace madali lng mkakuha mga parts sa eclipse unlike supra but of cors supra is one hell of a ride..

medyo naliliitan at nasisikipan nman ako sa mr2.

[Jun aka Pekto]

eclipse for me(hehe obvious ba).. if there's something wrong or need to be replace madali lng mkakuha mga parts sa eclipse unlike supra but of cors supra is one hell of a ride..

medyo naliliitan at nasisikipan nman ako sa mr2.

The MR2 is the only 2-seater among the 4. The rest are 2+2 sports coupes. Of course, that makes the MR2 turbo pretty light which makes it quite fast for a car with 200hp. It's prized among collectors here.