New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22
  1. Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    266
    #1
    MANILA, Philippines–A test case invoking the Philippine Lemon Law, the new legal protection for Filipino consumers who purchase new motor vehicles that turn out to be defective, has been filed in the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI).

    Named respondents in a complaint filed on Sept. 22 by businessman Ricardo Nolasco Jr. were Mandaluyong City-based Audi Motorcars Inc. as the manufacturer and PGA Cars Inc. as the dealer.

    Nolasco, a retired Air Force colonel and resident of Muntinlupa City, sought the replacement of the brand-new Audi A6 3.0 TDI he had bought on May 30 due to defects that could not be repaired despite multiple returns to the dealership.On Aug. 27, Nolasco sent a demand letter to Benedicto Coyiuto, the Audi Philippines head, invoking his rights under the Philippine Lemon Law and the 1992 Consumer Act of the Philippines under RA 7394.

    When Audi and/or PGA did not heed his demands, he filed the case in the DTI, which under the law has jurisdiction over cases involving disputes covered by the Philippine Lemon Law.

    New lemon law put to the test | Inquirer Business

  2. Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2,767
    #2
    ang ganda ng kotse ni retired colonel ah. reminds me of the PNP chief tuloy.

  3. Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    5,975
    #3
    There is justice in this world! Next will be the BIR sniffing at his door step.

  4. Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    185
    #4
    Any update regarding the matter? I'm quite curious to see if this lemon law actually works and protect us consumers.

  5. Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    8,590

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    2,537
    #6
    isang buan di na claim?

    tska iba ang complainant sa owner???
    Last edited by Stigg ma; November 22nd, 2014 at 09:02 AM.

  7. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,357
    #7
    potek dummy na naman

  8. Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    392
    #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Syuryuken View Post
    potek dummy na naman
    Uso na ngayon yun eh

  9. Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,822
    #9
    nag rereklamo na hindi gumagana cd player eh pirated naman pala ang sinalpak.:bwahaha:

  10. Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    339
    #10
    My beach resort pa sa pagudpud ilocos norte yan HANNAS BEACH RESORT AND CONVENTION CENTER bka hindi sa knya nakapangalan..hahaha

  11. Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    185
    #11
    Obviously, there are two side to the story but if this is the last update then disappointingly this "lemon law" has failed the consumers (I was hopeful, but not really surprised of the outcome). This isn't much of a resolution. Nag-deny lang ulit yung car company (Audi). And not only that, I find it even more disturbing na Audi-ph would also bring up and/or attack the complainant by saying the car isn't even under his name. Ano gusto nila palabasin?

    Definitely not going to buy nor recommend to family and friends any Audi cars in the near future if this is the kind of people you would be dealing with.

  12. Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,077
    #12
    In a decision dated March 2, 2015 and penned by adjudication officer Ronald Calderon, the DTI found Audi Motorcars Incorporated and PGA Cars Incorporated (the local distributor of the German luxury automobile in the country) “jointly liable for the imperfections” of an Audi 6 3.0 TD, which was bought in May 2014 by Ricardo L. Nolasco Jr.

    Audi/PGA should replace the “lemon” Audi with a similar one “in a perfect state of use or reimburse the amount paid, with monetary updating,” the decision said.
    Replace ?lemon? Audi, DTI orders car dealer

  13. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,702
    #13
    What's funny is that, under the IRR for the lemon law, the dealer should have had more chances to fix the car.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  14. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,234
    #14
    Apparently the car was bought before the implementation of the Lemon Law. They used the Consumer Act which only gave the dealer 30 days to fix a complaint.

    Dimagiba clarified though that DTI did not use as legal basis the Philippine Lemon Law since the vehicle was bought in May, and the law was enacted in August 2014.

    Thus, the Consumer Act was used as the legal basis, citing Article 100, "if the imperfection is not corrected within 30 days, the consumer may alternatively demand the options provided.

  15. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,702
    #15
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnM View Post
    Apparently the car was bought before the implementation of the Lemon Law. They used the Consumer Act which only gave the dealer 30 days to fix a complaint.
    Yun nga... which means the guy was lucky... I think Lemon Law provides a bit longer, as well as the three(?four?) strikes rule.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  16. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,234
    #16
    12 months or 20k kilometers, 4 strikes, 4 wheelers only.

    Republic Act No. 10642 | Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines

  17. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,819
    #17
    hay buhay!

    mine, 1st strike at 5300 km/5 months after purchase. 2nd and 3rd last december lang. then 4th strike 2 weeks ago lang at 9253 km. same problem, turbo-turbo-turbo-turbo. well, turbo hose yung strike 3 so maybe not counted hehehe. turbo plus intercooler yung strike 4.

    kaso purchased in february 2014, lemon law took effect august 2014. di rin sakop ng consumer act, more than 30 days bago lumabas ang sira. tawa-tawa na lang, walang magagawa e.
    Last edited by yebo; March 6th, 2015 at 04:40 PM.

  18. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,357
    #18
    Quote Originally Posted by yebo View Post
    hay buhay!

    mine, 1st strike at 5300 km/5 months after purchase. 2nd and 3rd last december lang. then 4th strike 2 weeks ago lang at 9253 km. same problem, turbo-turbo-turbo-turbo. well, turbo hose yung strike 3 so maybe not counted hehehe. turbo plus intercooler yung strike 4.

    kaso purchased in february 2014, lemon law took effect august 2014. di rin sakop ng consumer act, more than 30 days bago lumabas ang sira. tawa-tawa na lang, walang magagawa e.
    bakit yung Isuzu Trooper na mahigit isang taon na-refund naman. pa media mo na yan!

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by yebo View Post
    hay buhay!

    mine, 1st strike at 5300 km/5 months after purchase. 2nd and 3rd last december lang. then 4th strike 2 weeks ago lang at 9253 km. same problem, turbo-turbo-turbo-turbo. well, turbo hose yung strike 3 so maybe not counted hehehe. turbo plus intercooler yung strike 4.

    kaso purchased in february 2014, lemon law took effect august 2014. di rin sakop ng consumer act, more than 30 days bago lumabas ang sira. tawa-tawa na lang, walang magagawa e.
    bakit yung Isuzu Trooper na mahigit isang taon na-refund naman. pa media mo na yan!

  19. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,819
    #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Syuryuken View Post

    bakit yung Isuzu Trooper na mahigit isang taon na-refund naman. pa media mo na yan!
    binigyan mo ako ng pag-asa! so pwede kahit purchased before august 2014?

    may isang repair attempt pa sila e. sabi ko pag release sa akin ng unit ifu-full tank ko tapos ihahataw ko ng naka-4L sa farm. tawa lang naman sa akin, okay lang daw.

  20. Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    9,431
    #20
    Yebo, pwede yata yung case mo sa consumer act. naka indicate kasi kailangan maiayos within 30 days. not 30 days from purchase. so pasok dapat yan. try to consult with DTI. baka pwedeng refund nalang. just in time sa all new hilux

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

AUDI Lemon Car