SLEX Alabang traffic

[ninjababez]

4 dead na daw ?

[shadow]

4 dead na daw ?

1 lang daw 3 injured. Statemet ng EEI


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[shadow]

Delayed na!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[gongrhey]

So nakapatong pa lang yung girder sa coping beam di pa naka-anchor kaya nung tinamaan nung crane nalaglag. Very unfortunate accident. RIP sa namatay.

[absinthe]

Actual video of the accident:

EDIT 12:47H: di ata nag emed ng maayos, link here

[shadow]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kagalingan]

masakit talaga doon sa namatayan kasi dumadaan ka lang bigla magkaganyan. TApos yung nainjured din masaklap yun paano kung putol kamay paa..

pero ang maganda dito eh mukhang well-compensated.

[kagalingan]

napanuod ko yung video nasagi ng crane. Bakit hindi pinahinto yung mga sasakyan pag may ganyan may tinatransfer sa taas. Naalala ko dito araneta avenue pag may ganyan construction once na gumalaw crane pinapahinto mga motorist.

Carelessness nangyari sobrang overconfident eh dikit na dikit sa kalsada.

[shadow]

Yari! na issuehan na sila ng work stoppage, wala na nagka leche leche na schudule.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[17Sphynx17]

Yari! na issuehan na sila ng work stoppage, wala na nagka leche leche na schudule.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Kinasuhan na ng reckless impudence resulting to homicide,injury and damage to property yung Crane Operator/Driver ng Subcontractor mismo.

Pero dapat yung Project Engineer nung segment na yun and yung safety office kinasuhan din sa side ng EEI. Nagtataka ako bakit wala sinabi about them.

Subcon nga yung crane operator, pero si EEI ang kumuha ng subcon na yun. They are under EEI's jurisdiction and responsibility during construction. So meron dapat sila kaso kung ganun din. Mag-iiba lang dynamic kung si SMC mismo kumuha ng Crane Subcon at hindi siya under EEI, which is not the case.

Tulad ng sabi ko sa parents ko, hindi pwede yung crane operator/driver lang may kaso. Alangan naman siya din yung baba para harangan at magmando ng traffic na responsibility din ng EEI to ensure safety of the public since dumadaan under an active construction site.

Yung sinasabi ng LGU ng Muntinlupa na kesyo dapat nagcoordinate sa kanila, lip service lang yun pang hugas kamay na wala sila alam. Hindi nila inisip na wala sila talaga kasalanan kasi responsibility ng EEI yun at all times while working on their segments of the Skyway. Kaya nga may OSHA and Safety Officer, may project engineers ka pa who should "know better".

SMC is not liable for anything. May CARI rin yan si EEI (Contractor's All Risk Insurance) by default, and as with all construction contracts, the property owner/developer is automatically not held responsible for the actions of the contractor that may lead to problems/issues.

Kaya medyo naiinis ako sa news na pinuntirya lang nila yung Crane Operator.

May work stoppage nga din, so wala na din yung new Feb 2021 deadline na adjusted.

Question though, yung kesyo rereview safety protocols ng Skyway Stage 3 constructions, diba may bumagsak na din na beam sa A Bonifacio last year ata

Skyway coping beam falls, causing heavy traffic at NLEX | Inquirer News

WATCH | 5 hurt, traffic snarled as beam falls from Skyway section under construction in Makati

So don't forget, walang nagbago. Nagrelax na yung leads sa site kaya nagkaganyan. Malapit na kasi matapos akala nila pwede na sige sige lang.

EDIT:
Consunji, EEI bag Skyway contracts | PPP CenterPPP Center

so with the ppp.gov link, EEI, responsible siya sa segment na ito along SLEX mismo sa may muntilupa. Siya din responsible sa segment sa A Boni sa bumagsak na biga last year. So 2 strikes na siya.

I think yung responsible for that Makati Segment na may bumagsak nung 2017 was DMCI, but correct me if I am wrong.

So, with the above facts... we have to apply the saying "Fool me once, shame on you (EEI). Fool me twice, shame on me (SMC and gov't)" Hindi mo na mababago yang mindset ng EEI personnel kung ganito nangyari na ulit under their watch.