New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,316
    #11
    The C.Drive also has a more sophisticated tire groove pattern, which is rather similar to the Dunlop Sport 01 which our Altis came with:

    C.Drive


    Sport 01


    The A.Drive on the other hand has a simpler 3-groove design:


    Which is more like the LM703 (which I really wouldn't wanna try again if I had the choice, given its poor showing in terms of quality):
    Last edited by jut703; February 27th, 2012 at 02:23 PM.

  2. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,316
    #12
    Oh yeah, back to my original question, which of these tires are still safe to be used?

    Quote Originally Posted by jut703 View Post
    I have 3 out of 5 tires for our Altis which seemingly have defects, but I need to know which two I can still use until I get my tires replaced.

    Here's the first tire, a Dunlop Sport 01 (205/55 R16), currently my spare tire. It was punctured twice on its sidewall, and it seems to have developed a bump:





    Here's the second tire, also a Dunlop Sport 01, which by the way are the stock tires the car came with. There's seemingly a tear on the sidewall:



    The third tire is new, less than a month old, a Dunlop LM703. Less than a week with the tire, it developed a large bump on the sidewall. More recently, the bump started developing tiny cracks:





    I'm going to try and get the LM703 replaced under warranty, as it's practically new. I doubt that the Sport 01's will get replaced as well though, what do you guys think? My guess is that Toyota will just say it's wear and tear. The car's 2 years old by the way, and has around 35000 km on the clock.

    Lastly, if I really do have to get all 3 tires replaced, what other brands do you suggest? I'm thinking of getting the tires not from the dealer anymore, as the pair of LM703's I recently got totaled over 12k, with wheel balancing included.

    I've heard that the Kumho Ecsta is rather decent, how much would those tires cost in 205/55 R16 form?

    Thanks guys.

  3. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    17,339
    #13
    To answer your question: None

    On what to get, the A-Drives come as standard on the Civic with 16" tires and feedback is generally good.

  4. Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    466
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by vinj View Post
    To answer your question: None

    On what to get, the A-Drives come as standard on the Civic with 16" tires and feedback is generally good.
    the A drives are pretty good. much better than any dunlop LM series. these came stock with the civic FD (1.8S) and ours are still pretty decent even after 4 years and over 40,000 KMs.

    the kumhos are okay as well, i think these are stock on the newer hyundais. haven't used them for a long time though (over a year old pa lang on our hyundai).

    Only good experience i had with dunlops are with the LeMans RV (RV501) way back in our old CRV. the LM (701, 702 and 703) all gave me headaches (experienced a sliding tail, pothole blowout, and numerous bubbles on the side walls)

  5. Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    8,557
    #15
    Where have you been driving?

  6. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,316
    #16
    The A.Drives seem to have generally positive feedback. Any comments on the fact that it's locally-made? I've got a friend who has a Civic 1.8S, he opted for a set of Ecstas over A.Drives because he says that the locally-made A.Drives are more prone to blowouts. These are at about 5k a piece, yes?

    Also, how does the A.Drive compare to the Dunlop SP Sport 01?
    And, what about the A.Drive versus the Ecsta SPT?

  7. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,316
    #17
    Quote Originally Posted by lowslowbenz View Post
    Where have you been driving?
    Personally, I just use it when strutting about the metro, as well as the occasional highway/provincial back-road run. The punctures were all incurred with my mother behind the wheel, mostly through hitting the gutter, such as in parking lots.

  8. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,316
    #18
    I've just contacted DKC for pricing of the following tires, all 205/55 R16:

    Kumho Ecsta SPT - 4.1k
    Dunlop SP Sport LM703 - 4.3k
    Yokohama A.Drive - 4.9k
    Bridgestone Turanza ER300 - ~6k (no stock, pending price increase)
    Dunlop SP Sport 01 - 6.8k
    Yokohama C.Drive - no price, no stock, per order basis

    I guess I'll be going with the Kumhos then.

  9. Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,604
    #19
    Been reading reviews and forum feedback of the LM703, grip isn't great either.

    The Ecstas seems like a good choice at this point.

  10. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,316
    #20
    Just to update, I've finally gotten a pair of Kumho Ecsta SPTs. Got them at DKC for 4.1k a pop.

    Right now, I'm running a weird combination of tires - Dunlop LM703 on the front/left side with about 1000 km on it (still pretty fresh, about a month old), Dunlop SP Sport 01 on the front/right side (came with the car, about 50-70% tread life), and the Ecstas at the rear.

    I'm just waiting for the replacement of my other LM703 which had a bump on the sidewall, and this would replace the front/right SP Sport 01 which will be relegated to spare-tire duties as it's almost a 3-year old tire.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Which Tires Can I Still Use?