The Perpetual NBA Thread

[BoEinG_747]

LBJ ..gagawin PG

ang laki nito at ang bilis..kawawa ang makaka harap nito

[theveed]

Local Long Interview with TMac

http://showbizandstyle.inq7.net/you/...ticle_id=19143

[theveed]

So true IMO...

Going international -- and paying for it

You are about to read some of the smartest analysis from any NBA player, coach or official about why it seems the Americans, when it comes to international basketball play, couldn't beat a foreign team composed of three French Poodles and two third-graders if their lives depended on it.

This is why we stink in international hoops, why we finish in third place despite having delicious NBA stars on the roster, or at least how Dallas owner Mark Cuban sees it. And he's right. He's so right that by the time you are done reading this you will be nodding your head in agreement.

"I can make it easy for you," Cuban said when I asked him to give me 10 steps to make America's international basketball experience more successful -- and less like having a left testicle being hit with a ball peen hammer. "Either we change all levels of basketball in the USA to play by international rules, or we get them to play by U.S. basketball rules.

"I would be willing to bet that if you brought back all the same teams in the final eight and played under NBA rules," Cuban said, "with an NBA ball on an NBA-sized court, we would torch them. The different rules require different skill sets. It's that simple.

"If one set of rules isn't natural to you, you will struggle to adapt," Cuban continued in his e-mail. "We hear it all the time about international players having to adapt to the NBA game. Here the rules are geared towards entertainment, which is a good thing. But if we changed to international rules, we would have a completely different set of stars and teams would be constructed and coached completely differently."

The international teams put more emphasis on pure shooting, for example. They don't care as much about slam dunks. They want to make outside shots, not highlight shows.

Don't stop reading. Cuban is just getting warmed up.

"And as far as wondering why the USA can't dominate the Olympics like the original Dream Teams, there is an easy answer," he said. "We plugged in our NBA stars to play against international teams that had been comprised of non-professionals forever. While at the same time the Soviet Union imploded, so the one team that also was filled with professionals didn't exist any longer."

"Of course the U.S. teams were going to kill any and every team," Cuban continued. "It was our stars against their amateurs. Well, 15 years later, they have had plenty of time to integrate their professionals into their teams. Their national teams not only start playing together much younger, they play together every summer and their players go pro younger. So they have professional players who are now playing together every summer, year after year, for well-funded national teams. On top of that, the top Euro (teams) play against each other. They get friendlies that are competitive. The U.S. team played against creampuffs a couple times before the tournament."

That makes so much sense my head hurts.

Cuban is not trying to diss the Dream Team, but what he says is true. That team did not play a series of pro teams. They played scrubs. It was like the Dallas Cowboys taking on a state college.

Then Cuban says something that at first I don't agree with, but then, after reading what he says, his argument sways me.

"All that said, I personally think that the NBA, from a business perspective, is stupid for letting our players play at all," Cuban explains. "We absorb all the risk and we have gained little if anything from it. Well, that's not completely true. (The) last six to 10 years of international competition have led media to call our players selfish, without basic basketball skills, ugly Americans and worse. This year's team was far better behaved and that's great. But we put ourselves in a no-win, everything-to-lose situation (just ask Memphis). That’s not good business. Ever."

When I tell Cuban that -- to borrow a lame phrase being used about another topic altogether -- refusing to play, instead of fixing the problems, would be cutting and running, he responds: "It's just a financial decision. The Olympics is nothing but a big business. It's not a platform for national pride. They are a competitor for advertising and TV dollars. Lending them our best players is a dumb business decision. It has nothing to do with winning or losing."

The Americans have everything to lose while international clubs have everything to gain. Keeping our NBA players out of it and reengineering the international team to play a more international style might be the best thing to do.

As usual, Cuban makes too much sense.

[Gumusut_Amige]

Mark Cuban is really a businessman's pride... pero very sensible ang sinasabi niya ngayon.

[tsupermario]

"All that said, I personally think that the NBA, from a business perspective, is stupid for letting our players play at all," Cuban explains. "We absorb all the risk and we have gained little if anything from it. Well, that's not completely true. (The) last six to 10 years of international competition have led media to call our players selfish, without basic basketball skills, ugly Americans and worse. This year's team was far better behaved and that's great. But we put ourselves in a no-win, everything-to-lose situation (just ask Memphis). That’s not good business. Ever."

funny... i was thinking about this meself. is it good for the nba business-wise if its players continue to lose like it did?

[theveed]

http://www.nba.com/features/behind_the_name.html

How the NBA Teams got its names

[ssaloon]

Report: Kukoc says he's likely to retire

[empy]

wawa naman tong thread na to....nakalimutan na in the hype over the fantasy b-ball threads :evillaugh

contribute naman ako:

i watched an article here about the future of Vince Carter. he's settled in really well with the Nets, and Jason Kidd makes his game easier and makes him look good as well. he has a player option for next year, and despite the synergy with Kidd and Jeffy, his future decision appears very much in doubt. his options are:

1. the most persistent rumor is that he's already secretly agreed to play in Orlando next year. with Jameer Nelson, Dwight Howard, and Darko in the starting 5, Vince is thinking about a deep run into the playoffs
2. he's also reportedly being wooed by Michael Jordan to be the marque player for the Bobcats. the 'Cats have a ton of talent that they are developing and bringing along the right way (the Joshes, JJ, Starvin Marvin Williams, Emeka), and are millions under the cap. Vince is interested because he can be the returning UNC hero, and instantly make the 'Cats the most talented team in the league
3. or he can stay with the Nets and take alley-oops from Kidd all game long. the only drawback here is that their big 3 will never get past the Heat and Pistons unless they add more talent.

[Eismann]

The Bobcats twist was a good one for VC in the 2 to 3 seasons to come, but they need to add another piece in the mold of a Chris Paul to contend deep into the playoffs. And of course playing for MJ is a hell of factor too.

Orlando will have a strong case with it's young core complementing VC's half-human half-amazing skills.

Maybe VC's motivation now is where he can get his first ring and staying with the Nets current system will certainly not give him that.

[kimpOy]

Grant Hill's contract to end huh...cap room talaga yan for the magic...