2017-2018 NBA Season

[ratboy]

Walang technically na mali dahil existing yun rule eh. Allowed sila na gawin eh, That's the point of the rule. Kung ni-review nila kung nasa restricted or not, review na rin nila yun tawag nila.

Diba meron earlier sa Game or sa Houston yun na yun 3 points ni klay, ni-reverse din nila ginawa nilang 2 pointer lang.

Si Jeff van gundy pala yun analyst, former NBA head coach Alam niya meron ganun rule. So it means existing and pwedeng utilized ng mga referees

So if you want to be technical about it. Kahit saan makarating walang mali sa ginawa mga referees. Sinunod naman nila yun rule.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Eto yung sinasabe specific kasi ito for the charging/blocking call. Yung sinasabi mo na kay klay eh generally yan na under 2 minutes review, Pero pag charging at blocking meron specific rule talaga para diyan eto oh:

Restricted Area Block/Charge

Since the 2012-13 season, referees have reviewed all block/charge calls when they are not reasonably certain as to whether the defender was inside or outside of the restricted area. For more information about what constitutes a block or a charge. Restricted area replays are conducted only during the last two minutes of the fourth period and during all of overtime.

When conducting their review, referees attempt to confirm or overturn their original call.

The call is deemed a block if referees deem the defender was:
- Not in a legal guarding position, or
- In a legal guarding position, but inside the restricted area
- The call is deemed a charge if the defender was in a legal guarding position and outside the restricted area.
- Referees also determine if any unsportsmanlike acts or unnecessary contact occurred."

"- the initial review has to be whether he’s in the restricted zone or not, and only from there they can determine if it’s a block or a charge. The issue Cavs fan and Ty Lue have is that there was no reason to review whether he was in the restricted zone, and so by the book the block/charge shouldn’t have been reviewed at all."

Eh klarong klaro nga na outside naman restricted kaya hindi dapat marereview technically, at kung ireview man yung position pa lang muna tapos nung klaro na sa review na outside restricted zone eh putol na dapat yun at hindi overturn, but ang nangyare tinuloy tuloy pa na overturn. nagkunwari na lang in doubt at conflict sa restricted area whether due to incompetence or luto eh both are unacceptable, grabe tuloy naging backlash ngayon sa officiating. Bukod sa jr smith blunder eh ito officiating pa dahilan bakit masama loob at di magkatulog mga fans..haha

[Juan Martinez]

According to my Briton boss kasi "game of the monkeys" ang NBA.

and what does he mean by that-- a racial slur?

[Juan Martinez]

_______________

[shadow]

Eto yung sinasabe specific kasi ito for the charging/blocking call. Yung sinasabi mo na kay klay eh generally yan na under 2 minutes review, Pero pag charging at blocking meron specific rule talaga para diyan eto oh:

Restricted Area Block/Charge

Since the 2012-13 season, referees have reviewed all block/charge calls when they are not reasonably certain as to whether the defender was inside or outside of the restricted area. For more information about what constitutes a block or a charge. Restricted area replays are conducted only during the last two minutes of the fourth period and during all of overtime.

When conducting their review, referees attempt to confirm or overturn their original call.

The call is deemed a block if referees deem the defender was:
- Not in a legal guarding position, or
- In a legal guarding position, but inside the restricted area
- The call is deemed a charge if the defender was in a legal guarding position and outside the restricted area.
- Referees also determine if any unsportsmanlike acts or unnecessary contact occurred."

"- the initial review has to be whether he’s in the restricted zone or not, and only from there they can determine if it’s a block or a charge. The issue Cavs fan and Ty Lue have is that there was no reason to review whether he was in the restricted zone, and so by the book the block/charge shouldn’t have been reviewed at all."

Eh klarong klaro nga na outside naman restricted kaya hindi dapat marereview technically, at kung ireview man yung position pa lang muna tapos nung klaro na sa review na outside restricted zone eh putol na dapat yun at hindi overturn, but ang nangyare tinuloy tuloy pa na overturn. nagkunwari na lang in doubt at conflict sa restricted area whether due to incompetence or luto eh both are unacceptable, grabe tuloy naging backlash ngayon sa officiating. Bukod sa jr smith blunder eh ito officiating pa dahilan bakit masama loob at di magkatulog mga fans..haha

Oh tama naman ah. Referees can review kung nasa restricted area or not then they can change their calla based on that and sa guarding position..Yun naman ang ginawa nila eh.

Yun sinasabi mo na kitang kita. Iba kasi point of view mo, iba sa referees, iba sa players, iba sa coaches. Depende kung nasaan ka During that play.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ketib]

and what does he mean by that-- a racial slur?

He always did, I heard also "****ing Filipinos".

[ratboy]

Oh tama naman ah. Referees can review kung nasa restricted area or not then they can change their calla based on that and sa guarding position..Yun naman ang ginawa nila eh.

Yun sinasabi mo na kitang kita. Iba kasi point of view mo, iba sa referees, iba sa players, iba sa coaches. Depende kung nasaan ka During that play.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yun na nga bottomline kung iba man point of view, pero fact remains na wala sa restricted so either incompetence of referee or luto both are way unacceptable in finals na maaring nag cost ng championship.

At sabi nga kung talagang in conflict at doubt position lang muna review hindi dapat tuloy tuloy na overturn, eh nakita na nga sa review na tama ang pwesto outside of restricted area na, bakit biglang dinerecho pa sa overturn. Kaya talagang napakamot ulo na lang na sa officiating

[Juan Martinez]

Eto yung sinasabe specific kasi ito for the charging/blocking call. Yung sinasabi mo na kay klay eh generally yan na under 2 minutes review, Pero pag charging at blocking meron specific rule talaga para diyan eto oh:

Restricted Area Block/Charge

Since the 2012-13 season, referees have reviewed all block/charge calls when they are not reasonably certain as to whether the defender was inside or outside of the restricted area. For more information about what constitutes a block or a charge. Restricted area replays are conducted only during the last two minutes of the fourth period and during all of overtime.

When conducting their review, referees attempt to confirm or overturn their original call.

The call is deemed a block if referees deem the defender was:
- Not in a legal guarding position, or
- In a legal guarding position, but inside the restricted area
- The call is deemed a charge if the defender was in a legal guarding position and outside the restricted area.
- Referees also determine if any unsportsmanlike acts or unnecessary contact occurred."

"- the initial review has to be whether he’s in the restricted zone or not, and only from there they can determine if it’s a block or a charge. The issue Cavs fan and Ty Lue have is that there was no reason to review whether he was in the restricted zone, and so by the book the block/charge shouldn’t have been reviewed at all."

Eh klarong klaro nga na outside naman restricted kaya hindi dapat marereview technically, at kung ireview man yung position pa lang muna tapos nung klaro na sa review na outside restricted zone eh putol na dapat yun at hindi overturn, but ang nangyare tinuloy tuloy pa na overturn. nagkunwari na lang in doubt at conflict sa restricted area whether due to incompetence or luto eh both are unacceptable, grabe tuloy naging backlash ngayon sa officiating. Bukod sa jr smith blunder eh ito officiating pa dahilan bakit masama loob at di magkatulog mga fans..haha

move on...

[rukawa11]

According to my Briton boss kasi "game of the monkeys" ang NBA.

Negrong mukhang unggoy nanaglalambitin ba brad? Haha hala racist, juice ko day paabot ��(grin)

[StockEngine]

sarap ng rerun on btv.. 4Q na [emoji16]

FOCUS

[shadow]

Yun na nga bottomline kung iba man point of view, pero fact remains na wala sa restricted so either incompetence of referee or luto both are way unacceptable in finals na maaring nag cost ng championship.

At sabi nga kung talagang in conflict at doubt position lang muna review hindi dapat tuloy tuloy na overturn, eh nakita na nga sa review na tama ang pwesto outside of restricted area na, bakit biglang dinerecho pa sa overturn. Kaya talagang napakamot ulo na lang na sa officiating

Panoorin mo nga ulit yun clip. Ang tawag yun nasa baseline na referee. Baka meron nakaraang na Player sa line of sight niya. Kaya yun pag tawag niya ng charging sabi ni Jeff van gundy, parang tumingin siya sa isa pang referee ewan ko kung blocking naman tawag nun isa. Kaya conflict and they have to review. Now na review nila wala sa restricted Area si james so now pwede na nila confirm kung tama ang tawag.

Eh bakit pinipilit mo na dapat yun restricted Area lang ang dapat nila review eh nasa rules nga na pwede nilang isabay pati yun tawag kung tama or mali.

The point is the rules na pwede nilang gawin.

Ikaw na lang magsabi ang be honest, since we have the luxury of replays.

Diba gumagalaw pa si James and naka side siya tapos yun shoulder niya ang pinatama niya?

Kahit ako during live action. Offensive foul ang tingin ko but Upon checking the replays, blocking talaga eh.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk