Results 11 to 16 of 16
-
July 5th, 2005 05:59 PM #11Originally Posted by mazdamazda
-
July 5th, 2005 06:31 PM #12
Nope... tire change would've d'qed him, wouldn't it? Besides, I believe it was more of Kimi's decision to go ahead with it rather than let up... when it comes to winning or living, most champions choose the former... they're all a little crazy.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
-
July 5th, 2005 11:08 PM #14Originally Posted by niky
The FIA also wrote a memo to MacLaren advising them that next time never compromise the safety of their drivers and that they should have forced Raikkonen to pit and change his tires for his safety .... which they didn't.
-
July 5th, 2005 11:11 PM #15Originally Posted by Field Master
Ironically, if they are indeed champion material, they should have raced in Indianapolis instead of boycotting it. Raikkonen had a much greater chance of surviving the Indianapolis circuit (by simply slowing down on a single curve) than surviving his flat-spot tires in the German circuit where he crashed.
Irony, right?
-
July 5th, 2005 11:12 PM #16
if senna's tire was underinflated, was there any telemetry data indicating the case?
3M Color Stable series are all above 50% TSER. RFID readable through the tint, stays good for...
What's the best car tint brand and color?