Impeachment against CJ Corona..

**umi001** · March 14th, 2012 06:13 PM

Wow, ang kapal ng mukha ni Lacson! Quoting the Constitution to Justice Cuevas, para daw "magabayan" sya ni Lacson!

**Retz** · March 14th, 2012 06:15 PM

Jinggoy reiterating the 45 properties divulge by the prosecution to the media. But only 24 properties in actual inclduing 3 parking space.

**umi001** · March 14th, 2012 06:20 PM

Atat na atat din naman 'tong mga senador na 'to.

**e-bundok** · March 14th, 2012 06:53 PM

marami palang source of income si CJ. akala ko ba hindi pwede ang double compensation sa government officials..

**acedal** · March 14th, 2012 06:59 PM

hintayin na lang matapos presentation ng defense

**umi001** · March 14th, 2012 07:32 PM

Originally Posted by e-bundok

marami palang source of income si CJ. akala ko ba hindi pwede ang double compensation sa government officials..

Talk with your local representative or send a letter to the senators to have them change the law, so people in government don't get all of these allowances and per diems

**wowiesy** · March 14th, 2012 08:12 PM

Originally Posted by umi001

Talk with your local representative or send a letter to the senators to have them change the law, so people in government don't get all of these allowances and per diems

sa mga ganoong "tax exempt" benefits... I think, pupuwedeng questionin yan.. although ang question dapat dyan, either BIR, or say, Congress... but since the 3 branches "respect" each other... need a precedent siguro for that to happen..

sa pagkaka alam ko.. tax exemptions should be explicitly mentioned in law... so.. depende kung saan o alin ang basehan ng mga nabanggit na mga allowances na yung ng Judiciary... maaari may basis na tax exempt yun.. pero kung talagang walang explicit exemption provided for by law... questionable nga...

**wowiesy** · March 14th, 2012 08:17 PM

Originally Posted by e-bundok

marami palang source of income si CJ. akala ko ba hindi pwede ang double compensation sa government officials..

not sure if a law somewhere provides a distinction between passive income and active income...

pero.. kung all income inclusive.. nararapat lang na malaki ang pay / salary... di naman siguro masama kung malaki ang income ng judge, gayong bawal sya mag karoon ng ibang negosyo / income source...

also wondering.. while there is a provision for divesting sa ibang executive positions (President, VP, etc)... di ko sure kung divesting lang ng assets.. or pati income sources dapat i divest... sa Executive din dapat ganoon.. pero ganoon din ba ang nangyayari? sa Congress... dapat full time congressman din sila... ganoon din ba ang nangyayari??