View Poll Results: Senate's verdict on CJ
- Voters
- 69. You may not vote on this poll
-
Guilty!
58 84.06% -
Not Guilty
9 13.04% -
i couldn't care less
2 2.90%
Results 1,821 to 1,830 of 4211
-
February 21st, 2012 12:50 PM #1821
Not offered as evidence but used as support in applying for a subpoena. That said, the prosecution did not vouch for the genuineness of the attachment now being disputed as fake or spurious. The impeachment court, in the meantime, is dwelling too much on how the document was leaked or if the source was from a public officer or a private individual --- all of which should be tackled in a separate investigation or forum.
-
Tsikot Member Rank 2
- Join Date
- Nov 2002
- Posts
- 1,326
February 21st, 2012 01:11 PM #1822so.. for subpoena... but not offered as evidence.. and yet.. even without offering as formal evidence.. lumabas na na may mga balances... kung hindi ebidensya, bakit hinayaang basahin yung mga balances? magka issue pa mamaya kung admissible o hindi... but since nai air na... immaterial na kung admissible or not... again. papasok yung political ba ito o judicial process...
talagang court of public opinion lang talaga ang laban ng prosecution...
-
February 21st, 2012 01:15 PM #1823
sabi nga nung mga guest ni tina monzon palma kagabi, there are product of no pre-trial arrangements.
-
February 21st, 2012 01:17 PM #1824
-
February 21st, 2012 01:20 PM #1825
kaya nga pati si Cuevas ay naguguluhan. hindi alam kung kaninong witness si Ogie Diaz. hindi daw pwede kalahati ay sa prosecution, the other half naman sa defense at ung natitirang porsyento ay sa senate judge. i-discuss na lang sa caucus sabi ni presiding officer.
-
February 21st, 2012 03:03 PM #1826
naku hindi po ako lawyer. yung issue regarding admisability eh hindi po pasok yan, dahil the annex will never marked as evidence.
yung parating sinasabi ng defense na fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine eh di rin pasok yan dahil hindi naman criminal case to at hindi i offer as evidence ng prosecution yung annex. now the issue on whether the annex are fake or not is best answered by another forum.
-
February 21st, 2012 03:07 PM #1827
but you have to understand the position of the defense. honestly mas madaling cite and technicaliities para ma quash ang bank subpoena than saying it was not the money of corona. plus the defense has promised to enrile that they will submit the details of dollar account in due time.
-
February 21st, 2012 03:09 PM #1828
kasalanan ni enrile lahat to eh, bat kasi masyado sya strict sa subpoena. kailangan pa talaga ang specific account number. so kahit saan mo tingnan you will be voilating the law either way.
-
February 21st, 2012 04:21 PM #1829
labo-labo na ang impeachment trial.
may treath na kay cuevas na tatakbo sila sa sc.
-
February 21st, 2012 04:22 PM #1830
GMA News *gmanews
Enrile tells Prosec's Lim, 'You're fishing for evidence' after Lim wanted to adopt documents requested by court. #CJTrial via *Joseph_Morong
in the olden days, anyone who does not move 'ala luksa during Holy Week, especially Good Friday,...
Traffic!