View Poll Results: Senate's verdict on CJ
- Voters
- 69. You may not vote on this poll
-
Guilty!
58 84.06% -
Not Guilty
9 13.04% -
i couldn't care less
2 2.90%
Results 1,201 to 1,210 of 4211
-
February 9th, 2012 07:56 AM #1201
Kala ko yung PSBank ang nagfile ng for TRO sa SC. Kasi they can be sued by CJ if linabas yung $$$ records niya w/o expressed consent. Patay rin yun kaso ng prosecution sa article 7 dahil kailangan nila yung SC records sa pagkupit ni CJ. Nadenied ni JPE yung subpoena.
-
February 9th, 2012 08:19 AM #1202
CJ to SC: Ipatigil na yang impeachment na yan. At mag inhibit yung di pabor sa akin
-
February 9th, 2012 08:47 AM #1203
... deleted
Last edited by CoDer; February 9th, 2012 at 08:48 AM. Reason: tab not working
-
February 9th, 2012 09:35 AM #1204Originally Posted by jansky
-
February 9th, 2012 09:38 AM #1205
Should SC stop Corona’s impeachment?
By: Artemio V. Panganiban
Philippine Daily Inquirer
As part of these checks and balances, the power to impeach the highest executive and judicial officials is granted “exclusively” to the House while the power to try and decide is lodged “solely” in the Senate. Why then should the impeached officials, especially the justices, be allowed to reverse impeachment actions against them? That would be self-serving. So, the common sense answer is: No, the Supreme Court cannot and should not stop impeachment proceedings.
Full Story:
Should SC stop Corona
-
February 9th, 2012 09:39 AM #1206
-
February 9th, 2012 09:45 AM #1207
What exactly is the bank secrecy law covering foreign dollar account? ngayon ko lang din nalaman ito.
-
-
Tsikot Member Rank 2
- Join Date
- Nov 2002
- Posts
- 1,326
February 9th, 2012 09:52 AM #1209Originally Posted by shadow
But as to how they arrive to a decision, i believe they still have to abide by the law at all times. Where the law does not provide exemptions, you can not make one for yourself. While it is also the constitution that provides for the bill of rights and holds due process to be of utmost importance, just because the respondent hasn't waived his rights, it doesnt mean na impeachment court can do everything that violates the rights and protection of the constitution and relevant laws afforded to the respondent.
Andysn na tayo na nakikita natin na may limitations ang batas. Solution then is to have the law amended (attention congress who prioritize non legislative functions ) or have the supreme court declare the covering provisions or the whole law as unconstitutional. May proseso pa rin.
-
February 9th, 2012 09:58 AM #1210
hindi na ba kailangan ng proof ng prosecution kung saan galing ung ganong kalaking pera.. ??? so mga ganong ebidensya is acceptable na sa court..
parang si Juan kumikita ng 500 pesos sa isang bwan, pero ang laman ng banko nya 5,000.. hindi na ba hahanapan kng saan nanggaling ung 5,000??? paano sya nagkaroon ng 5,000..parang kinalabasan pang huhusga agad kumbaga convicted agad sa pagnanakaw pero wala namang ebidensya...
so sa tingin ko ang burden nasa prosecution pa rin until such time na maglabas ng ebidensya kung saan nanggaling ung pera ni CJ. pag meron ng ebidensya tsaka naman patutunayan ng defense kung baket hindi naman nakaw..
Life Lessons From A Monk & His Tuned Mini Cooper S - Speedhunters Sent from my SM-S901E using...
Monk-owned R53