Impeachment against CJ Corona..

[niwde11]

teka baka sabihin nyo PRO corona ko ha. nakapusta ko sa conviction.:D

nililinaw ko lang yung nangyari at yung mga similarities na nangyayari. wala ako kinakampihan sa kanilang dalawa. kung pwede nga lang parepareho silang maconvict which is a miracle of course.:D

[jansky]

lumabas na ung unang laman ng acct nya.. susunod paano nila papatunayan na galing sa ilegal ung pera..

[galant E SS]

According to you and corona camp wanted it to be that way unfortunately hinde ganun...

Meron pang pwede ikaso Kay Penot, nag offer siya ng PSG Kay grace lee...oh kasuhan na yan! :rofl:

File na rin tayo ng petition sa SC prayer to stop impeachment proceeding against coronayo bec of the earthquake sa negros

Read ARTICLE VIII, Sec. 1 of the 1987 Phil. Constitution:


Judicial Department


SECTION 1. The judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such lower courts as may be established by law.

Judicial power includes the duty of the courts of justice to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable, and to determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or instrumentality of the Government.

[galant E SS]

sir pag may grave abuse of discretion or authority ang impeachment court... ang S.C. ang mag interpret po o ang magdedecide kung may violation sa constitution ang senate impeachment court..... ganun talaga sir weather weather lang po... pag naging CHIEF JUSTICE NA si penoy cya naman ang mag interpret ng batas natin... mag aral muna siya ng law at pag pumasa sya... AT NABAKANTE ANG POSITION NA CHEAP JUSTICE mag apply po cya sa JBC... cgurado qualified syang maging CHEAP JUSTICE... Peace.....

I agree. This is expressly provided for by ARTICLE VIII of the 1987 Phil. Constitution, which reads:


Judicial Department


SECTION 1. The judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such lower courts as may be established by law.

Judicial power includes the duty of the courts of justice to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable, and to determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or instrumentality of the Government.

and Rule 65 of the Rules of Court:

RULE 65

Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus

Section 1. Petition for certiorari. — When any tribunal, board or officer exercising judicial or quasi-judicial functions has acted without or in excess its or his jurisdiction, or with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction, and there is no appeal, or any plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, a person aggrieved thereby may file a verified petition in the proper court, alleging the facts with certainty and praying that judgment be rendered annulling or modifying the proceedings of such tribunal, board or officer, and granting such incidental reliefs as law and justice may require.

The petition shall be accompanied by a certified true copy of the judgment, order or resolution subject thereof, copies of all pleadings and documents relevant and pertinent thereto, and a sworn certification of non-forum shopping as provided in the third paragraph of section 3, Rule 46. (1a)

Section 2. Petition for prohibition. — When the proceedings of any tribunal, corporation, board, officer or person, whether exercising judicial, quasi-judicial or ministerial functions, are without or in excess of its or his jurisdiction, or with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction, and there is no appeal or any other plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, a person aggrieved thereby may file a verified petition in the proper court, alleging the facts with certainty and praying that judgment be rendered commanding the respondent to desist from further proceedings in the action or matter specified therein, or otherwise granting such incidental reliefs as law and justice may require.

The petition shall likewise be accompanied by a certified true copy of the judgment, order or resolution subject thereof, copies of all pleadings and documents relevant and pertinent thereto, and a sworn certification of non-forum shopping as provided in the third paragraph of section 3, Rule 46. (2a)

Section 3. Petition for mandamus. — When any tribunal, corporation, board, officer or person unlawfully neglects the performance of an act which the law specifically enjoins as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station, or unlawfully excludes another from the use and enjoyment of a right or office to which such other is entitled, and there is no other plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, the person aggrieved thereby may file a verified petition in the proper court, alleging the facts with certainty and praying that judgment be rendered commanding the respondent, immediately or at some other time to be specified by the court, to do the act required to be done to protect the rights of the petitioner, and to pay the damages sustained by the petitioner by reason of the wrongful acts of the respondent.

The petition shall also contain a sworn certification of non-forum shopping as provided in the third paragraph of section 3, Rule 46. (3a)

Section 4. When and where petition filed. — The petition shall be filed not later than sixty (60) days from notice of the judgment, order or resolution. In case a motion for reconsideration or new trial is timely filed, whether such motion is required or not, the sixty (60) day period shall be counted from notice of the denial of said motion.

The petition shall be filed in the Supreme Court or, if it relates to the acts or omissions of a lower court or of a corporation, board, officer or person, in the Regional Trial Court exercising jurisdiction over the territorial area as defined by the Supreme Court. It may also be filed in the Court of Appeals whether or not the same is in aid of its appellate jurisdiction, or in the Sandiganbayan if it is in aid of its appellate jurisdiction. If it involves the acts or omissions of a quasi-judicial agency, unless otherwise provided by law or these Rules, the petition shall be filed in and cognizable only by the Court of Appeals.

No extension of time to file the petition shall be granted except for compelling reason and in no case exceeding fifteen (15) days. (4a) (Bar Matter No. 803, 21 July 1998; A.M. No. 00-2-03-SC)

[Retz]

magkano kaya ang nilalaman sa limang dollar account? any estimate or wild guess?

[CoDer]

magkano kaya ang nilalaman sa limang dollar account? any estimate or wild guess?

Yan ang tanong.

Takbo agad sa SC si Corona ng bank accounts nya na ang kinukuha. Pinapa inhibit nya pa si Carpio at Sereno, abay pag inhibitin nya rin yung mga pumalakpak sa kanya during his palaban speech.

[CoDer]

lumabas na ung unang laman ng acct nya.. susunod paano nila papatunayan na galing sa ilegal ung pera..

Hindi na kailangang patunayan yan. Pakita lang nila sa korte na grossly disproportionate ang ari-arian at pera sa banko ni Corona.

Burden will shift to the defense pag nagawa nila yan.

[energizer_jc]

Here's to hoping that nothing bad happens to PS Bank..

[explorer]

totohanin kaya ni corona ang sinabi nya na kung sino man yung makakita ng bank account nya na merong deposit na malaking halaga sa kanya nalang? baka barya lang yung sa peso account kaya ok lang sa kanya na ipamimigay seguro malaki tiwala nya sa bank secrecy law na di pwede buksan yung dollar account nya kaya ok lang ipamimigay nya yung laman ng peso account nya.

[marg]

Halatang may tinatago si Thief Justice.