View Poll Results: Senate's verdict on CJ
- Voters
- 69. You may not vote on this poll
-
Guilty!
58 84.06% -
Not Guilty
9 13.04% -
i couldn't care less
2 2.90%
Results 621 to 630 of 4211
-
January 24th, 2012 08:22 PM #621
-
January 24th, 2012 09:18 PM #622
-
-
January 25th, 2012 08:40 AM #624
More...Google search results include ******* files.
Why Should You Fear SOPA and PIPA? - Forbes
Passage of SOPA or PIPA will essentially allow the Government to shut down the DNS (Domain Name Server) that directed a URL such as Google or Download music, movies, games, software! The Pirate Bay - The galaxy's most resilient Bit******* site to the physical address of the server its IP address such as (254.196.2.x). Domain names are simply a fancy and more informative way for you to find a website since the data for a website resides on a server somewhere and that server has a digital address identified by something called an IP or (internet Protocol) address. The Bills target the DNS servers that direct users from the URL name to the IP address. For most users, shutting down an infringing DNS address would prevent them from reaching the website that contained the infringing content or the link to the infringing content. It would NOT however stop the pirate from typing in IP address of (256.196.2.x) as an example, to reach the same content. In short, it wouldn’t stop the pirates from downloading illegal content any more than background checks stop a gang member from purchasing a hand gun. Gang members don’t buy guns legally and Pirates, hackers and criminals never open the legal route either. It’s simply too messy and too easy to get caught. SOPA and PIPA are dangerous, half-baked solutions that will cost millions of jobs, stifle innovation and ultimately do nothing to stop piracy at all. It could be used as a solution for those in Government that seek to silence their opposition, even if that was never the intention.
-
January 25th, 2012 08:57 AM #625
Oops...wrong thread. Can't edit it cause the edit function is screwed up.
The prosecution was complaining that they already had witnesses lined up when the court was adjourned. The judges haven't decided whether the Article (which is vague and poorly written) would allow any evidence beyond the SALN...
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 623
January 25th, 2012 09:25 AM #626Sibakin na yang Karen na yan. Nakaka irita pag nag salita at pag nag interview. Buti na lang si Web ngayon.sakit nga sa tenga boses ni karen.
parang kinakapos sa hangin na nai-iri na ewan.....
Si puro angas tupas ayaw nyo sibakin.
-
January 25th, 2012 09:48 AM #627Originally Posted by tomboy
Easy Lang kasi Sa reply deep breath muna at basahin mabuti....
Don't let anger cloud the friendly banter here...
Nahahalata tuloy na masyado mong sineseryso Ang usapan n impeachment :rofl:Last edited by shadow; January 25th, 2012 at 09:52 AM.
-
January 25th, 2012 09:49 AM #628
Enrile: Are you saying that the court shall accept hearsay evidence?
Tupas: No, im not saying that your honor.
Enrile: Are you saying that the court should allow leading testimonial evidence?
Tupas: No, your honor.
Enrile: Then what do you want by being liberal?
Tupas: I want this court to be flexible. Blah Blah...
langhya, nilabasan ako dito kay tupas. parang babae. he should be direct and straight to the point on what he wants. ang lenient na nga ni manong johnny.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 623
January 25th, 2012 09:53 AM #629Ah si karen davila ba. Sa channel 2 pala kayo nanunuod ah. Ibang channel ako.
Correction nga pala. heart evangelista or mariel rodriguez lookalike.
-
January 25th, 2012 09:56 AM #630
bebe eksa, saan kayo nagchuchurch???
Traffic!