Results 211 to 220 of 247
-
November 24th, 2011 01:18 PM #211
sir i disagree po... bec. 1st for all WALA naman hold departure order... walang warrant, wala din pang case na naka file sa court... so theres no LEGAL REASON na hindi cya payagan lumabas ng bansa... A Watch list is only a watchlist....
2nd... the s.c. released the TRO AT 5PM... alam naman nila na hangang 5 pm lang ang office hours why take that long to release the order of TRO? AS EARLY AS 2PM may TRO NA... BAKIT hindi muna nila pinadalhan ng copy ang doj... eh samantalang nasa tabi lang ng s.c. yun? then bakit 5pm? para sarado na..? i smell something fishy...
3rd... syempre hindi makakalabas ng bansa si gma at KASI HINDI nakatangap ng copy ng tro ang doj....
4rth.... bakit hindi inimplement ng s.c. ang tro? bakit walang order sa sheriff to implement the order of the court? BAKIT hindi kasama sa ORDER NG TRO NA IMPLEMENT NG SHERIFF ANG TRO?
5th.. bakit hindi binigyan ng 24hrs.. to file comment on the motion to cite delima in contempt of court? bakit 15days ang binigay?
6th... ang dahilan eh para ma ifile na ang case against gma.. at hindi na sya makalabas...
ang ginawa ng s.c. eh... pinagbigyan si gma kasi ayun ang nasa batas... pero idenelay din nila... para mabalewala ang tro na issue nila...
kung kumakampi ang s.c. kay gma dapat ang ginawa ng s.c. eh... inimplement agad ang TRO THRU A COURT SHERIFF... THEN ICONTEMPT AGAD SI DELIMA AT MAG LABAS NG WARRANT FOR DELIMAS ARREST... FOR DISOBEYING the COURT ORDER.. BECAUSE DE LIMA IS ALSO A LAWYER SHE KNOWS BEST.... AND S.C. CAN DO THAT....
DISKARTE ANG GINAWA NG MGA TAGA S.C.... SYEMPRE BAKA ALAM DIN NI PNOY AT DELIMA YUN... kita mo at wala nang mangyayari sa MOTION FOR CONTEMPT... THE WORST LANG EH... MALAMANG FINE LANG ANG IBIGAY KAY DE LIMA...
ANG GALING DUMISKARTE NG S.C... HINDI HALATA.... ANG TAwag dyan eh... EXTRA LEGAL...
-
-
-
November 25th, 2011 09:54 AM #214
-
November 25th, 2011 10:14 AM #215
ang s.c. most of the time but not all the time... kakampi sa mga nasa pwesto yan basta wag lang sobrang halata at garapal ang ipapagawa..... at pwede nila justify sa batas natin...
pinagbigyan ng executive dept. ang s.c. re. judiciary funds... now its their turn na pagbigyan naman ang palasyo.... sa hindi halatang paraan....
-
-
November 25th, 2011 12:52 PM #217
-
November 25th, 2011 12:57 PM #218
I'd give anything to be a fly on the wall when the justices are deliberating en banc.
From what I've heard, the discussions were quite spirited, if not heated between the Arroyo-appointed justices and the other justices who came in afterward.
-
November 25th, 2011 01:11 PM #219
the 8 so called coronayo justices miscalculated their move last week when they issued the TRO. they thought the executive will back down and just sheepishly heed to their collective bias decision.
sabi nga ni Packy "now you know!"
-
November 25th, 2011 02:48 PM #220
thats another issue... congress po ang hindi nag approve ng additional funds hindi po binawasan ang pondo yung additional funds na hinihingi na s.c. ang hindi binigay ng congress.....
the issue im talking about is regarding savings of the judiciary, jdf, saj, fiduciary..etc... the executive br. wants it back... to be re-deposited to the bureau of treasury... the s.c. said they have the sole discretion on those funds.... actually the s.c. uses those savings for the benifits of their personnel s.c., c.a., rtc, mtc...
Toyota Corolla Cross ... because the other 2 are china made ... Toyota is very conservative at how...
MG4 EV Standard vs BYD Atto 3 Dynamic vs Toyota...