Version of F 22 Raptor

**v6dreamer** · June 8th, 2008 11:00 AM

If you have the money, would buy this car for $1,500,000 dollars. Most people said yes but, no matter how rich you are you cant buy this car...its been sold long before the production and extremely limited (20 cars to be exact).

**nurse_corrupted** · June 8th, 2008 12:13 PM

I think that's the Lamborghini Revington. Yah 20 units only.

It's pretty talaga but not for our roads out here in the Phil.

Saw a Lambo Gallardo here. Sa 4 or 6 inches na humps hirap lumundag e.

**StraightSix** · June 8th, 2008 07:38 PM

Originally Posted by nurse_corrupted

I think that's the Lamborghini Revington.

And the type of aircraft is Panavia Tornado.

**redorange** · June 8th, 2008 08:35 PM

I was looking for the F22 and but find a Tornado.

I was wondering why the plane looks nothing like the ones landing near my backyard. BTW here's a footage of the B2 bomber that crashed a few months back, everyone has always said that the plane couldn't be flown by humans without computers for assistance and this proves it.

http://guampdn.com/apps/pbcs.dll/art...VIDEO/80606011

**v6dreamer** · June 9th, 2008 02:37 AM

Originally Posted by StraightSix

And the type of aircraft is Panavia Tornado.

Yae.. its the Tornado next to it.

The Lamborghini Reventon exterior was inspired from the F22 Raptor but sad to say that the U.S Air Force denied the car company to take a picture head to head with the REVENTON and the F22 RAPTOR said for security reason of the stealth fighter.

**bbt** · June 9th, 2008 04:45 AM

Originally Posted by redorange

I was looking for the F22 and but find a Tornado.

I was wondering why the plane looks nothing like the ones landing near my backyard. BTW here's a footage of the B2 bomber that crashed a few months back, everyone has always said that the plane couldn't be flown by humans without computers for assistance and this proves it.

http://guampdn.com/apps/pbcs.dll/art...VIDEO/80606011

actually, a lot of modern planes rely on computer assistance to maintain flight, including the f-22 raptor. it's called fly-by-wire, and it's actually not a bad thing to have at all

**Jun aka Pekto** · June 9th, 2008 06:37 AM

Originally Posted by bbt

actually, a lot of modern planes rely on computer assistance to maintain flight, including the f-22 raptor. it's called fly-by-wire, and it's actually not a bad thing to have at all

OT
It is when the power goes out. These types of aircraft violate the principles of aerodynamics in order to be stealthy and maneuverable. I have to wonder if these aircraft have any glide capability at all that could at least allow for a deadstick landing like those old prop planes gliding in for an emergency landing without any engine power.

If I was filthy rich like say, an oil sheik.... I'd have a one of a kind supercar custom-designed and made by Lambo just for me

.....just like going to a tailor. He He.

It's probably happened. Who knows what rare supercars hide in the garages of the super-super rich?

**bbt** · June 10th, 2008 01:46 AM

Originally Posted by Jun aka Pekto

OT
It is when the power goes out. These types of aircraft violate the principles of aerodynamics in order to be stealthy and maneuverable. I have to wonder if these aircraft have any glide capability at all that could at least allow for a deadstick landing like those old prop planes gliding in for an emergency landing without any engine power.

true, but from a design perspective it doesn't make much sense to stick to a strict set of aerodynamic guidelines just to allow for the possibility of a power failure which, if the plane is made properly, isn't supposed to happen anyway. besides, if you lose power in a combat situation, you'll have other things on your mind besides gliding towards land

oh, and btw, engines are a completely seperate system from the electronics, so i would technically be possibly for the engines to lose power, while the fly-by-wire systems would still be working.