Results 11 to 20 of 33
-
-
July 5th, 2004 10:41 AM #12
the GLS also had a 3rd brake lamp, but not the LED type like that of the MX.
-
July 5th, 2004 11:25 AM #13Originally posted by ssaloon
the GLS also had a 3rd brake lamp, but not the LED type like that of the MX.
meron din GLX miks.. ;)
-
July 5th, 2004 11:49 AM #14
The 01 models of the GLS and MX had a nice looking engine cover, kala mo ang laki ng makina mo, tapos sa ilalim it's the same old 4G92.
The 00 didn't have one, and it had the shorter bumpers and non-power antenna.
-
July 5th, 2004 12:06 PM #15
i think that the cosmetic difference between the MX series and the GLX/GLS series for model 2000 are:
a) the tail pipes (MX) has two (twin pipes), while the GLX/GLS has one;
b) the MX/GLS has rear seat headrests, the GLX has none;
c) the MX/GLS has cupholders, the GLX has none;
-
SiRaNeko
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Posts
- 973
November 26th, 2004 10:45 PM #16questions po abt stock 2001 mitsubishi lancer glx manual transmission
carb o efi?
1.6 or lower?
16 valve o 12 valve?
thanks
-
-
SiRaNeko
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Posts
- 973
November 27th, 2004 08:41 PM #18thnx art
btw would u know kung ano kms/liter, highway n or city drivin
-
November 28th, 2004 12:37 PM #19Originally posted by buknoy2002
thnx art
btw would u know kung ano kms/liter, highway n or city drivin
but a fair guesstimate would be 7-8km/liter for city, highway would be 10-12km/liter all depending on your driving style and car condition. Like I said these are all guesstimates. ;)
-
Na lock ang Gcash ko, need verification pa and kasama sa list nila ang philsys ID paper, but when I...
National ID Law