Results 11 to 18 of 18
-
October 12th, 2015 09:37 AM #11
-
October 12th, 2015 11:01 AM #12
There is a problem vis-a-vis the so-called "heritage sites" insofar as it conflicts with private ownership. AFAIK, even if government declares a site to be a "heritage site" but it's privately owned, it cannot legally prevent the owners from tearing the structures on it down...unless government expropriates it.
-
October 12th, 2015 11:05 AM #13
Ayala Land has to put their money somewhere and they are running out of land... Look at Rockwell, they had to build on the last remaining open land (basketball court) in front of the mall...
Last edited by Monseratto; October 12th, 2015 at 11:07 AM.
-
October 12th, 2015 11:16 AM #14
-
October 12th, 2015 11:52 AM #15
Yup. Till now, those asking for the demolition of Torre De Manila before the SC can't cite a specific law which protects sight lines of national monuments. They can't even cite international conventions stating that such sight lines are supposed to be protected. Kaya kita mo, puro motherhood statement at batikos laban sa DMCI lang ang ginagawa sa media.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 1,709
October 12th, 2015 12:00 PM #16sa Turkey meron din ganung case, 3 luxury condo, pina demolish ng high court.
-
BANNED BANNED BANNED
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Posts
- 4,581
October 12th, 2015 12:20 PM #17sayang. the philippine bar association (pba) had its induction last month at the intercon with mar roxas as the inducting officer. i didn't know then it's already due for closure .
-
that may be, but we all got plastic, young and old. we asked the lto guy, "papel ba po, o...
Driver's License Renewal Process?