Results 21 to 30 of 71
-
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 54
November 19th, 2006 11:53 PM #22i liked the movie. A more serious, stone-faced and brooding type of james bond. Initially, i had doubts pero after seeing the movie astig tong si daniel craig!
Daniel Craig has apparently signed on for 3 more Bond films and shooting will start sometime next year na. Si Pierce Brosnan 4 Bond movies rin yata to the best of my recollection...
-
November 19th, 2006 11:55 PM #23
The reason for that is because Casino Royale is supposed to be a prequel to the James Bond series, kumbaga parang Batman Begins ang concept niya. The story is about Bond as a newly hired double 0 agent and this is supposed to be his 1st mission. Back to basics kumbaga. Di bale, sa mga susunod na installments balik na si Q, gadgets & more bed scenes.
I agree. Maganda naman yung story, ok naman ang acting ni Craig pero meron talagang binabagayang itsura at pagkilos ang character ni James Bond. He doesn't have the characteristic "swagger" of the previous Bonds.
At wala ring ABS.
Oo nga, ang bilis niyang tumakbo. Naalala ko tuloy si Forrest Gump.
Unfortunately, Craig was signed up to a 3-movie contract, so we would be seeing him in 2 more Bond flicks. The next one is scheduled to show on May 2008.
I think Hugh Jackman was highly considered kaya lang nakatali na raw siya sa X-Men series.
-
November 20th, 2006 01:10 AM #24
Clive Owen - pwede, but too "honest looking"; nonetheless good for espionage flicks (remember Bourne Identity?)
Ewan McGregor - ngingiti lang yan, the enemies will die
Colin Farrell - to me looks more like a military man, not for espionage
Hugh Jackman - pwede rin, pero baka gamitan niya ng Wolverine powers
Eric Bana - to me he looks better fitting a rebel's role
-
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Posts
- 6
November 20th, 2006 03:45 AM #26buti pa kayo mga sirs nag enjoy, wish i cud say the same for the film. ok cya as an action film, but IMHO, its not a 'james bond' film.. wla lng.. tama c sir automahn, its supposed to be a prequel. but then the presentation of the film is different, prang hindi james bond film eh.. IMHO lng. ie wlang girls sa intro??? no Q, no car chase, at anyone notice mas marami pang body shots c james bond kaysa sa bond girl? even for a prequel i would have liked to see a more ***y scenes sa bond girl.. at as somebody pointed out d craig is no pierce brosnan when it comes to charming women. parang hindi 'natural.'
un lng po. otherwise a good action film.
-
November 20th, 2006 04:10 AM #27
Hindi nga nya ma-charm e... sya yung naloko...
Talo pa sya kay master russpogi pag dating sa chicks... :evillaugh
-
BANNED BANNED BANNED
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Posts
- 3,790
November 20th, 2006 04:34 AM #28If you have seen the first few movies ng James Bond nuong 60's puro suntukan lang talaga and almost no gadget (meron pero very few)....being a prequel...you can't get anything too much on the gadget.
-
November 20th, 2006 06:54 AM #29
-
November 20th, 2006 07:07 AM #30
hear about the feedbacks and eto ang pinakamature na bond film na napanood ko mas centered sa personal character niya at wala mga hi tech na stuff mas realistic
ang di ko lang gets diba double O status na siya bakit sinabi pa ni M na napromote siya sa double O? sa poster tignan niyo 7 lang nakalagay
Babala! Sarado at Ginagawa mga south bound flyovers along c5. Medyo mabagal Ang daloy kanina Ng...
Traffic!