2017 Mazda CX-5

[mda]

Toyota could have tuned the engine to be livelier the same way Honda has done with the Accord’s K24 or Mazda with its SkyActiv 2.5L.

True, but I don't think the steering and the chassis could keep up din... Dami kailangan palitan for the 'magic' to happen.

[Egan101]

My personal ride is a Camry 2.5V. I find the power more than adequate. It accelerates with authority and can haul 4 passengers up Tagaytay Midlands on D without a sweat. The 6AT is smooth and the ride is extremely comfortable. Plus it is as reliable as a ref.

Midsize cars with 2.4L or 2.5L NA engines still offer better performance compared to base model CUVs with smaller 2.0 L NA engines. They also offer a comfortable ride. A CUV’s ground clearance and multi-purpose cargo area are its advantages over a base model midsize car.

If I were to choose, I would still pick an Accord or Mazda6 or Camry over a CRV or CX5 or RAV4.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Archerfish]

...

What if I tell you that you can buy a CUV that is comfortable enough, has a big cargo area, decent room on the rear, not underpowered, and drives well for its size? Too bad it’s not a Mazda or a Honda.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

May I know what is this CUV? I'm curious...

[diehard]

Midsize cars with 2.4L or 2.5L NA engines still offer better performance compared to base model CUVs with smaller 2.0 L NA engines. They also offer a comfortable ride. A CUV’s ground clearance and multi-purpose cargo area are its advantages over a base model midsize car.

If I were to choose, I would still pick an Accord or Mazda6 or Camry over a CRV or CX5 or RAV4.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In my family, my wife is the one into CUVs because of the ride height and cargo room (more shopping!). I prefer the power and comfort of mid-size sedans, which is why I've never considered a PPV vehicle. Am thinking about getting an FXT to replace my Camry (if Subaru still comes out with one) in 2019. Mid-size vehicle's resale value is not good, and the Forester's ride is comfortable enough substitute.

[Egan101]

May I know what is this CUV? I'm curious...

A Subaru Forester XT, bro. It is roamy inside, the trunk is big enough, and can give you a bonkers of a ride. It’s a tamed WRX for dads like me.

If you have more money to spare, an Audi Q5 or RS4 would fit the description also.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[StockEngine]

A Subaru Forester XT, bro. It is roamy inside, the trunk is big enough, and can give you a bonkers of a ride. It’s a tamed WRX for dads like me.

If you have more money to spare, an Audi Q5 or RS4 would fit the description also.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

the next gen forster is even bigger [emoji3][emoji3][emoji3]

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[Egan101]

In my family, my wife is the one into CUVs because of the ride height and cargo room (more shopping!). I prefer the power and comfort of mid-size sedans, which is why I've never considered a PPV vehicle. Am thinking about getting an FXT to replace my Camry (if Subaru still comes out with one) in 2019. Mid-size vehicle's resale value is not good, and the Forester's ride is comfortable enough substitute.

Subaru announced they may not release an XT model of the Forester for the next generation. However, Motor Image said they will be releasing locally a Levorg 2.0DIT. Its engine is in the same tune as the WRX unlike the FXT with its FA20 detuned.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Nelson de Leon]

Hello everyone. I'm new to Tsikot. I am choosing between the Mazda CX5 Pro and Honda CRV 2.0S. I prefer the styling of the CX5 (as well as its conventional 6-speed AT). However, I have a few questions:

4) Is cargo room adequate and useable? The sloping rear hatch seems to cut the vertical space quite a bit.

TIA

1. My vote for comfortable ride goes to CR-V. However, let's wait for someone who owns a CX-5. Nelson?

2. I go for Mazda, and you should know what I'm trying to say. Your experience should tell you how you are "connected" with the car.

I haven't driven the CRV 2.0 so cannot comment on that.

Yeah the sloping rear does cut vertical space. I have compared it with use Tucson. Tucson has bigger truck numbers but the CX-5 for me has more "useable" space. The "connection" you said is the jinba ittai principle of Mazda.

A Subaru Forester XT, bro. It is roamy inside, the trunk is big enough, and can give you a bonkers of a ride. It’s a tamed WRX for dads like me.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I've tried the turbo 2016 XT and its a monster! Very powerful. I just find the suspension too stiff for me. I have yet to see a CUV that can beat turbo XT in terms of speed and acceleration.


Sent from my ASUS_Z012D using Tapatalk

[StockEngine]

I haven't driven the CRV 2.0 so cannot comment on that.

Yeah the sloping rear does cut vertical space. I have compared it with use Tucson. Tucson has bigger truck numbers but the CX-5 for me has more "useable" space. The "connection" you said is the jinba ittai principle of Mazda.



I've tried the turbo 2016 XT and its a monster! Very powerful. I just find the suspension too stiff for me. I have yet to see a CUV that can beat turbo XT in terms of speed and acceleration.


Sent from my ASUS_Z012D using Tapatalk

youre in luck. there wont be an xt after it runs out [emoji24]

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[diehard]

youre in luck. there wont be an xt after it runs out [emoji24]

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

There are rumors that only the "XT" moniker will go away to be replaced by "Sport". Rationale being that most Americans understand what "Sport" badging means whereas "XT" to them means nothing. Hopefully this is the case...