Report: LTFRB official wants only PUVs on EDSA during rush

**ZENMasterTYL** · October 3rd, 2014 12:32 PM

Originally Posted by Monseratto

Who agrees that the source of traffic during rush hours are the private car owners...

huh, what traffic? maayos naman ah

**machinepistol** · October 3rd, 2014 01:03 PM

I agree. These buses are the real culprits on EDSA. Time to create a two bus company market for ease of enforcement.

**badkuk** · October 3rd, 2014 02:43 PM

i think i can understand why they think bosses "can afford to be late"...

...ganun siguro lahat ng bosing sa gobyerno ^_^

**IMm29** · October 3rd, 2014 02:46 PM

Originally Posted by badkuk

This is kind of like bringing down lawlessness by imposing a 24-hour curfew.

Put a bullet in the head of a few of these drivers from hell for driving like an arsehole and let's see what they do about it.

**leodawesome** · October 3rd, 2014 05:17 PM

Originally Posted by Monseratto

Who agrees that the source of traffic during rush hours are the private car owners...

Uhhh, dapat yata sibakin yung MMDA na nasa pic? Or kahit suspension lang.

**IMm29** · October 8th, 2014 11:10 AM

Are private cars really the biggest cause of pollution in Metro Manila? | TopGear.com.ph

Interesting...

Coz private motorists just happen to be the easiest ones to push out -- save for the high and mighty with their bodyguards.

They can't apprehend motorcycles, and they've already extorted from the PUVs and trikes their periodic protection money.

**vinj** · October 8th, 2014 01:24 PM

Originally Posted by IMm29

Are private cars really the biggest cause of pollution in Metro Manila? | TopGear.com.ph

Interesting...

Coz private motorists just happen to be the easiest ones to push out -- save for the high and mighty with their bodyguards.

They can't apprehend motorcycles, and they've already extorted from the PUVs and trikes their periodic protection money.

Personally i think banning old cars might even increase pollution. Old cars that are maintained properly still have very decent emission test ratings and can still be efficient. People maintain them because they still see it to be useful to them in the long run. If you ban old cars, people who buy cars will just run them to the ground and avoid maintenance costs on the premise that they have no value from the cars in a few years time as they have to be junked and decommissioned anyway.

**badkuk** · October 8th, 2014 01:54 PM

Hmm, mas marami akong nakikita smoke belcher na PUV kesa private.

For the sake of argument, sabihin na natin that private cars will pollute more per km/hour they are drive: how many km/hours on average are private cars being driven, compared to PUVs?

**cardict** · October 9th, 2014 06:25 AM

Originally Posted by badkuk

Hmm, mas marami akong nakikita smoke belcher na PUV kesa private.

For the sake of argument, sabihin na natin that private cars will pollute more per km/hour they are drive: how many km/hours on average are private cars being driven, compared to PUVs?

+1 ,private cars upon reaching point B from point A stop ,consuming a fraction of a day,while those PUV dragons consume the whole day running around the metropolis

**ess** · October 9th, 2014 11:09 AM

Originally Posted by IMm29

Put a bullet in the head of a few of these drivers from hell for driving like an arsehole and let's see what they do about it.

<I removed the image... though it's historical and public domain... might be too graphic.>

You mean like this? (Famous image of ARVN general shooting a deathsquad member in the head)