New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

View Poll Results: Do you believe in fuel economy benefits of a small displacement turbo engine?

Voters
9. You may not vote on this poll
  • Fact

    6 66.67%
  • Hoax

    3 33.33%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,704
    #11
    Ecoboost Explorer. And economy was better. Slightly. Not really much you can do to improve the economy of a car that heavy in traffic, but it was good on the highway.

    But since it was FWD, as opposed to the V6, which only comes in AWD, it's hard to tell whether more of the fuel savings are due to the motor or the lack of extra driveline drag.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  2. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,316
    #12
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnM View Post
    Fifth Gear dragged the Focus Ecoboost vs the 1.6 NA. Guess who won

    Fifth Gear Season 21 Episode 7
    This episode came to mind too when I saw the thread title. So what gives, is it really more efficient?

  3. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,165
    #13
    Quote Originally Posted by jut703 View Post
    This episode came to mind too when I saw the thread title. So what gives, is it really more efficient?
    IMO yes because off boost (like just puttering around the city) the smaller engine will use less fuel than a larger one. Talo-talo na on the hiway where more power is needed and the engine is on boost most of the time.

  4. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    2,075
    #14
    This reminded me of the turbo era in Formula 1 wherein the displacement was set to 1.5 liters turbocharged engines in response to the oil crisis back then. They say turbo is coming back to F1 next year but this time using 1.6L engines.

  5. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,165
    #15
    Yep F1's going turbo next year with 1.6 V6s.



    Renault expect F1 turbo engines to deliver 600 bhp | YallaF1.com

  6. Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,945
    #16
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnM View Post
    Cappuccino?
    657cc why not?


  7. Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    8,557
    #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Mguy View Post
    This reminded me of the turbo era in Formula 1 wherein the displacement was set to 1.5 liters turbocharged engines in response to the oil crisis back then. They say turbo is coming back to F1 next year but this time using 1.6L engines.
    Yeah, that was in the 80's IIRC. Kalakasan ng TAG-Porsche Mclaren.

  8. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    29,354
    #18
    Meron na kaya turbo kit for the MIRAGE 1.2L ?

  9. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    2,075
    #19
    Quote Originally Posted by ghosthunter View Post
    Meron na kaya turbo kit for the MIRAGE 1.2L ?
    This would be nasty!!

  10. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    688
    #20
    there is a turbo kit for picanto and chevy spark from torcon korea. and i heard that speedlab is trying to develop turbo kits for 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 liter displacements

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Going Eco: Small Displacement + Turbo, Fact or Hoax?