Results 11 to 15 of 15
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 116
-
July 13th, 2013 01:03 AM #12
well definitely the vios has a higher FC compared to the GSX by a decent margin.
-
July 13th, 2013 08:07 AM #13
The N16 GSX MT offers a bit better FC over its AT sibling, maybe 9km/L or better. My previous N16 GS (AT) used to do around 8km/L. By the way, the QG16 engine of the N16 GS/GSX requires 95RON fuel.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 116
July 13th, 2013 09:54 AM #14as what others have suggested, im leaning towards vios when it comes to fc and resale value. perhaps thats the vital reason why the resale of nissan is lower than vios.
hmm, i still wonder why people selling their gs/gsx's as fuel efficient cars. what is the standard fc for all 1.6 cars on the highway drive?
-
July 13th, 2013 11:15 AM #15
A modern 1.6 can easily do 12 to 14 on the highway and 9 to 10 in the city (normal traffic.... Not gridlock). In contrast, a 90s 1.6 will do around 2-3km/l less.
Definitely ill go for a Vios over the Sentra in most cases.
suzuki #2... kahit malayo... heh heh.
Car Sales Data (2023)