New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community
New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. Shrek
    Shrek is offline Tsikot Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1
    May 31st, 2007 05:08 PM #1
    Our family is going to definitely buy a new Civic. However, before choosing the final model to purchase we need to know the fuel consumption of each model in both City drive and long drives.

    a. Civic 1.8S (manual)
    b. Civic 1.8S (automatic)
    c. Civic 2.0 (manual)

    Is it right to assume that the fuel consumption of the 1.8S matic is not far from the 2.0 manual on City driving?

    Hope anyone responds to this.

    Thanks!!!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. niky's Avatar
    niky
    niky is offline SobrangBilisMagType!
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,704
    May 31st, 2007 05:14 PM #2
    Mahirap sabihin... konti lang may 2.0 MT dito...

    I know for a fact that the 1.8 AT is still better than the 2.0 AT in city driving, although the new 2.0 AT isn't a horrible guzzler like the previous 2.0 AT, but I don't have any word on real-world economy of the 2.0 MT.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Tsikot

Civic 1.8s Manual vs. 1.8s Matic vs. 2.0s Manual