Results 41 to 46 of 46
-
August 3rd, 2012 09:18 AM #41
375 NM of torque is more than enough for some light to moderate off-roading action. That's what really matters for economy and pulling power, rather than peak power... which will only affect flat-out acceleration and top speed.
I wouldn't think so. My "underpowered" Crosswind still gets up to 16 km/l despite the stupid-low gearing. If an engine is tuned more for economy than power (see the Toyota 2.5 D4D) then economy should be good.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
August 3rd, 2012 01:41 PM #42
Haha thats why i cant let go of my crosswind kahit mag 180k na tinatakbo...
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 1,709
August 5th, 2012 06:39 AM #43Looking at brother's 4x4 colorado this few weeks and the 4x4 ranger on the road, both these truck needs a 2-3" leveling kit to make it look better. As is now with their size they are kinda low.
-
Tsikot Member Rank 2
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 1,557
August 5th, 2012 11:35 AM #44I have seen both units plying along Commonwealth but different days. They were both black, both 4x4 and for me, the Ranger wins by a mile in the looks department. I don't know but I feel that there is something wrong with the looks of the Colorado both front and back. I am not feeling it. But the Ranger, whew! It's really macho and very, very good looking. I haven't seen their interiors, though.
-
August 6th, 2012 03:00 PM #45
The 2.2 engine in the Ranger is already enought to provide some decent performance figures.
It's also currently used in the Land Rover Defender and in the Ford Transit vans.
But, after all, I'd rather get a Chevy over the Ford. With automatic transmission, the 4cyl 2.8 in the Chevy is rated at the same torque of the 3.2 in the Ford.
Cummins engines are my favorite ones. Ever.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 186
September 2nd, 2012 03:15 AM #46
Daming issue ng SU7:grin:
Xiaomi E-Car