Battle of the Transmissions: M/T vs. A/T

[sirkosero]

you prefer almost-tailgating to proper safe distance?
just so's hindi sila maka-singit?
isn't that... dangerous?

for me, "sumingit na kayo, wag lang tayo mag-miting ng fender".
heh heh.

Thats ego driving. Nabawasan siguro pagkalalake.

Sent from my MI MAX 2 using Tapatalk

[dr. d]

Thats ego driving. Nabawasan siguro pagkalalake.

Sent from my MI MAX 2 using Tapatalk

...shouldn't be allowed.
egos have no driver's license.
heh heh.

[ray_noel]

...shouldn't be allowed.
egos have no driver's license.
heh heh.

Hahaha... galit sa mga naka una sa kanya... as much as possible dapat walang harang ang harapan nya while travelling sa hi-way doc...


Sent from my iPhone XS Max using Tapatalk

[oj88]

Just to be clear, my "no quarter" attitude does not apply when driving at speed. Only when at a stop or at very slow-moving or crawling traffic. Particularly so, if the offender is a PUV. It gets my blood boiling to see them 'steal' your lane just to stop a few meters ahead to let in/out passengers.

When moving at speed, you are welcome into my lane as long as you do it legally and safely.

[franklinbenitez]

both has pros and cons to consider. a/t's comfort can be attained in exchange of
higher fuel consumption, brakes, and battery among those.

m/t's burden during heavy traffic really is annoying but the versatility esp
during emrgency acceleration is unquestionably superior. the last thing
is you can't fall asleep with m/t.

for some of the comparisons this could help.

Page not found – Yehey.com

Yes. I agree.

[Jun aka Pekto]

Normally, I'd choose a conventional AT over a MT because of convenience. But, when it comes to a CVT replacing an AT, I would rather have MT. I have reservations about a CVT's durability.

That is, I'd be fine if a CVT will last 14-15 years because at that point, it would be time to get rid of the car and buy a new one. Right now, I'm not even sure if a CVT will last 10 years.

[Ry_Tower]

Normally, I'd choose a conventional AT over a MT because of convenience. But, when it comes to a CVT replacing an AT, I would rather have MT. I have reservations about a CVT's durability.

That is, I'd be fine if a CVT will last 14-15 years because at that point, it would be time to get rid of the car and buy a new one. Right now, I'm not even sure if a CVT will last 10 years.

You have a point there. Plus it may be more expensive to repair a CVT rather than an AT.

[StockEngine]

Normally, I'd choose a conventional AT over a MT because of convenience. But, when it comes to a CVT replacing an AT, I would rather have MT. I have reservations about a CVT's durability.

That is, I'd be fine if a CVT will last 14-15 years because at that point, it would be time to get rid of the car and buy a new one. Right now, I'm not even sure if a CVT will last 10 years.

sa pinas iba conditions bro. crawling traffic basically means low torque applications. tatagal mga cvt.

[Egan101]

sa pinas iba conditions bro. crawling traffic basically means low torque applications. tatagal mga cvt.

You can still see a lot of old Jazz/City IDSI and Lancer Cedia models on the streets despite some being not being maintained religiously.

[istan]

Got a lancer 2004 mx. Cvt still alive


Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk