battle of the small cars

**saipeme** · June 8th, 2009 04:22 AM

altis for me...spacious,comfortable,mascular appearance,more stable in the highway + it has the more luxury feeling among your choices...steering is too light? i beg to disagree i own one before i would say the steering is sweet, well controlled even at high speed vey good for city driving and manoeuvring...go to each dealer compare and test drive...

**beereo** · June 8th, 2009 04:57 AM

i'll surely get the altis because it's a bigger vehicle. the power and acceleration is far better than that of the city or vios considering that it has a bigger engine displacement. it is more suitable for your usual route.

**tidus1203** · June 8th, 2009 01:36 PM

Originally Posted by noobskie

The City 1.3 AT's really good. Checked out the interior, its as spacious as my old 97 civic. The 1.3 engine's efficient yet powerful for its size, and then there's the clincher, its looks. No wonder its selling like hotcakes, imagine half of honda's sales are from the city alone?

Yes that is true, half of Honda's passenger vehicles sale in fact more than half is City. Its quite a looker talaga.

**tsupermario** · June 8th, 2009 02:54 PM

i'd get the jazz over the city

**Type 100** · June 8th, 2009 02:59 PM

No offense but the second-generation Vios just has zero appeal - and it's cramped at the back. My head touches the ceiling when I'm in the back seat and I'm just 5'8".

Out of the choices I'd either pick the ZZE141 Corolla or the GM1 City. The City is a fine car, reminiscent of its namesake from 1999-2002. The Corolla is an improvement over its older ZZE121 brother.

**mey0r** · June 8th, 2009 06:12 PM

For me, Ill trim it down to Lancer CVT vs. City. True, Mitsubishi just added icing on their old Lancer, but safety wise, it has 2 airbags already with ABS. Looks, I still bet for Lancer. Price, very reasonable. CVT has a good FC. City, well the car says for itself.