Results 81 to 90 of 100
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Posts
- 375
March 23rd, 2014 02:02 AM #81Expect the new mazda to be more fuel efficient. Our mazda 3 2007 1.6 model can run 350+ kms in 1 full tank mix driving same consumption with my friend's 1.5 jazz
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
-
March 24th, 2014 12:08 AM #83
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Posts
- 375
March 24th, 2014 11:19 AM #84That's the least I can get. Still not efficient though )
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
March 24th, 2014 12:12 PM #85
Hmm Parang hindi ata matipid sir ah, I do 450kms in 45-48 liters Lancer EX 1.6 mixed city driving. May kasama ng upak yan (but not redline driving), but kung madalas upak andun tayo sa 48 liters. Kung redline driving na mixed city, nsa 8~ km/l ang FC.
My last refill I did 552 kms in 48.39 liters, chillax driving lang.
TS, ayaw mo icheck ang Lancer EX? Alam ko nasa 750k lang ang base unit GLX manual.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 487
March 24th, 2014 01:48 PM #86^Rock, anong usual na byahe mo nyan? Ave speed?
BTT, aesthetics, sa Civic ako. I dont know, ganon ata talaga ang looks ng Civic, it grows on you. Kung may 1.6 lang sya, malaki kakainin nya sa sales ng Altis/Lancer.
-
March 24th, 2014 02:40 PM #87
True, it might take some of the sales in other compacts with a 1.6L engine but putting a smaller, less powerful engine on the FD/FB chassis will not make wonders on its fuel consumption. It might even take a dip as the smaller engine will need to work harder to push the weight of the platform. Not sure about the actual figures but I don't think the FD/FB is as light the previous gen EK or ES.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Posts
- 126
March 24th, 2014 03:50 PM #88I am getting 10km/L on the city and 15km/L on the highway on my Mazda CX-5 2.0L. Mixed ko ngayon nasa 12km/L (8.4L/100km) on a 40%-60% highway-city mixed route 4 passengers usually. Consider a lighter body (Mazda 3) fitted to that 2.0L engine... Or consider a 1.5L engine on a Mazda 3 body that has the same power-to-weight ratio as the CX-5. I think you'll have a ballpark figure of what to expect as far as fuel consumption goes.
-
March 24th, 2014 05:45 PM #89
Those figures are quite good for a CUV with a 2.0L engine. Those figures are more like from a light compact or even a sub-compact. Inputs from owners of Lancer EX 1.6L also report the same figures. The 2009 City 1.5L I drive sometimes also get about the same figures.
A Mazda3 with the same engine as the 2.0L CX-5 will be one zippy drive plus the fuel efficiency of a sub-compact.
-
March 24th, 2014 06:33 PM #90
Isa na lang hinihintay ko sa Mazda 3...Pricing :D
Oo nga TS, why not include the Lancer EX on your list? There is a good reason why there are so many of them in our roads. Alam ko lang na downside ng EX is the small trunk space.Last edited by leodawesome; March 24th, 2014 at 06:35 PM.
I've used Stainz Out and Stain Guard from Glaz (Microtex) but I noticed it made my windshield form...
Hydrophobic Glass Treatments