New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 5678910 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 100
  1. Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    375
    #81
    Expect the new mazda to be more fuel efficient. Our mazda 3 2007 1.6 model can run 350+ kms in 1 full tank mix driving same consumption with my friend's 1.5 jazz


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    2,543
    #82
    Quote Originally Posted by NewbDriver View Post
    Galing lang ako Honda dealership, hindi na sila nagcacarry nung Japan na version ng bagong Civic, so no rear camera, folding rear seats, and bluetooth ang mga bagong units. Unless ang dealer na mapupuntahan mo eh may natitira pang Japan version.
    FYI pls, medyo matagal na walang civic na japan made stocks in manila since last year pa ata. Kung mayron man natitirang stocks ay magtaka ka na bat di pa nila mai-dispose yan. I'm sure all honda dealers are practicing FIFO..
    Last edited by kimbon; March 23rd, 2014 at 06:46 AM.

  3. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #83
    Quote Originally Posted by Ciz View Post
    Expect the new mazda to be more fuel efficient. Our mazda 3 2007 1.6 model can run 350+ kms in 1 full tank mix driving same consumption with my friend's 1.5 jazz


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    350 km for a 55L tank? That's about 6.5 km/L, which is awful for a 1.6.
    It also confirms the general opinion that the 1.6 Mazda of old is a gas guzzler relative to its displacement.

  4. Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    375
    #84
    That's the least I can get. Still not efficient though )


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    576
    #85
    Quote Originally Posted by Ciz View Post
    Expect the new mazda to be more fuel efficient. Our mazda 3 2007 1.6 model can run 350+ kms in 1 full tank mix driving same consumption with my friend's 1.5 jazz


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Hmm Parang hindi ata matipid sir ah, I do 450kms in 45-48 liters Lancer EX 1.6 mixed city driving. May kasama ng upak yan (but not redline driving), but kung madalas upak andun tayo sa 48 liters. Kung redline driving na mixed city, nsa 8~ km/l ang FC.

    My last refill I did 552 kms in 48.39 liters, chillax driving lang.

    TS, ayaw mo icheck ang Lancer EX? Alam ko nasa 750k lang ang base unit GLX manual.

  6. Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    487
    #86
    ^Rock, anong usual na byahe mo nyan? Ave speed?

    BTT, aesthetics, sa Civic ako. I dont know, ganon ata talaga ang looks ng Civic, it grows on you. Kung may 1.6 lang sya, malaki kakainin nya sa sales ng Altis/Lancer.

  7. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #87
    Quote Originally Posted by b0y37 View Post
    BTT, aesthetics, sa Civic ako. I dont know, ganon ata talaga ang looks ng Civic, it grows on you. Kung may 1.6 lang sya, malaki kakainin nya sa sales ng Altis/Lancer.
    True, it might take some of the sales in other compacts with a 1.6L engine but putting a smaller, less powerful engine on the FD/FB chassis will not make wonders on its fuel consumption. It might even take a dip as the smaller engine will need to work harder to push the weight of the platform. Not sure about the actual figures but I don't think the FD/FB is as light the previous gen EK or ES.

  8. Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    126
    #88
    I am getting 10km/L on the city and 15km/L on the highway on my Mazda CX-5 2.0L. Mixed ko ngayon nasa 12km/L (8.4L/100km) on a 40%-60% highway-city mixed route 4 passengers usually. Consider a lighter body (Mazda 3) fitted to that 2.0L engine... Or consider a 1.5L engine on a Mazda 3 body that has the same power-to-weight ratio as the CX-5. I think you'll have a ballpark figure of what to expect as far as fuel consumption goes.

  9. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,608
    #89
    Quote Originally Posted by Albastru View Post
    I am getting 10km/L on the city and 15km/L on the highway on my Mazda CX-5 2.0L. Mixed ko ngayon nasa 12km/L (8.4L/100km) on a 40%-60% highway-city mixed route 4 passengers usually. Consider a lighter body (Mazda 3) fitted to that 2.0L engine... Or consider a 1.5L engine on a Mazda 3 body that has the same power-to-weight ratio as the CX-5. I think you'll have a ballpark figure of what to expect as far as fuel consumption goes.
    Those figures are quite good for a CUV with a 2.0L engine. Those figures are more like from a light compact or even a sub-compact. Inputs from owners of Lancer EX 1.6L also report the same figures. The 2009 City 1.5L I drive sometimes also get about the same figures.

    A Mazda3 with the same engine as the 2.0L CX-5 will be one zippy drive plus the fuel efficiency of a sub-compact.

  10. Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,362
    #90
    Isa na lang hinihintay ko sa Mazda 3...Pricing :D

    Oo nga TS, why not include the Lancer EX on your list? There is a good reason why there are so many of them in our roads. Alam ko lang na downside ng EX is the small trunk space.
    Last edited by leodawesome; March 24th, 2014 at 06:35 PM.

Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 5678910 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

2014 Altis vs 2013 Civic